Tracking Indian Judiciary: News, Updates & Discussions

[ArjunMK1A]

Clear case of judicial over reach by Milaudas. If I've understood the case right it was about establishing the paternity of the child not about maintenance of the child by the husband of the child's mother .

In the event the latter filed a maintenance claim filed on her paramour alleging him to be the father of her child as opposed to her legally wedded husband whom she subsequently divorced.

What's more while upholding the right of the paramour to not be submitted for a paternity test , the court's legally sanctioning cuckoldery by refusing a similar test to the husband by cooking up all kinds of scenarios in favour of upholding the child's rights while erecting barriers to prevent establishing paternity by the husband.

In other words it's the husband's responsibility whether he's the biological father or not to bear expenses of the child.

Few days Madras High court simply refused to follow an Supreme court order of investigating an Rapist since he is connected to the ruling party.

Looks like within the courts there seems to be contradictory messages going on. Judges were more or less corrupted and have baap attitude. Common people will avoid court for an reason due to the level of corruption going in lower sessions courts.

 

[Azaad]

Meet Kshipra & Shiv Shankar: Dalit Researchers Who Won ₹127 Crore Compensation in India's First Intellectual Property Case Under Caste Atrocities Act

Nagpur- Imagine someone who has never studied law or stepped inside a courtroom, suddenly becoming a party in a case—representing themselves, arguing not just f

en.themooknayak.com

2 Delete researchers win a landmark INR 127 crores compensation by Milaudas of the SC to be paid by the Govt of Maharashtra in a precedent setting case for loss of IPR under the Prevention of Atrocities of SC/ST Act. How is that possible you ask ? Read on .

Alhamdulillah !

 

[vampyrbladez]

These retards want US like madness here in India

No child will be discriminated against: Supreme Court on plea for Rohingya access to public schools

No child will be discriminated against in education, the Supreme Court said on Wednesday (February 12, 2025) while fixing for next week a plea seeking a direction to the Centre and the Delhi governments to grant Rohingya refugees in the city access to public schools and hospitals.

The court just wants to know where these Rohingya families are living, in whose house and what are their particulars, a Bench of Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh said while making the the no discrimination in education point.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/natio...ools-to-rohingya-refugees/article69210269.ece

 

[Azaad]

These retards want US like madness here in India

No child will be discriminated against: Supreme Court on plea for Rohingya access to public schools



https://www.thehindu.com/news/natio...ools-to-rohingya-refugees/article69210269.ece

This can also be a double edged sword. Most of the Rohingyas can be tracked thru this mechanism if the GoI is smart about it. Then again this is assuming the GoI & the Courts aren't acting in tandem.

 

[DingDong]

indian men to keep a watch on wife's activities, else additional members will have to be added to his ration card.

Man remains legal father of child born out of wife’s adultery: Supreme Court | Kochi News - The Times of India

The Supreme Court of India ruled that in cases where a marriage subsists and spouses have access to each other, the husband remains the legal father o

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Clear case of judicial over reach by Milaudas. If I've understood the case right it was about establishing the paternity of the child not about maintenance of the child by the husband of the child's mother .

In the event the latter filed a maintenance claim filed on her paramour alleging him to be the father of her child as opposed to her legally wedded husband whom she subsequently divorced.

What's more while upholding the right of the paramour to not be submitted for a paternity test , the court's legally sanctioning cuckoldery by refusing a similar test to the husband by cooking up all kinds of scenarios in favour of upholding the child's rights while erecting barriers to prevent establishing paternity by the husband.

In other words it's the husband's responsibility whether he's the biological father or not to bear expenses of the child.

Laws don't protect the individuals. Laws are meant to protect the society and prevent destitution. Rights of the institutions and the society take precedence over the rights of an individual. The law and the court are correct in this case, even it costs the "husband" a bit.

 

[sameer]

https://www.aninews.in/news/national/politics/brazen-violations-of-sc-orders-owaisi-on-gujarat-govt-demolishing-illegal-structures-in-dwarka20250127112145/

https://kmsnews.org/kms/2025/02/08/indian-authorities-demolish-mosques-shrines-among-36-structures-in-gujarat.html

BTW, it seems that orders passed by our esteemed Miyalards on demolitions last year weren’t followed here in recent Gujarat bulldozer actions.

 

[Azaad]

Laws don't protect the individuals. Laws are meant to protect the society and prevent destitution. Rights of the institutions and the society take precedence over the rights of an individual. The law and the court are correct in this case, even it costs the "husband" a bit.

The courts went about & decriminalized adultery. This was the next logical step. Both these moves were aimed at benefiting individuals not society as a whole . OTOH infidelity is grounds for divorce.

Besides in that particular case you're referring to the paternity test was withheld because the person accused of fathering the kid wasn't co operating & the SC held that questioning the paternity of the child will stigmatize the child in the eyes of the world.

Hence it is the legally wed husband who's NOT the biological father who will have to bear expenses to raise the child. Quite obviously his rights don't matter .

I call this andher nagari chaupat raja.