Tracking Indian Judiciary: News, Updates & Discussions

[Azaad]

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/supreme-court-lays-down-8-factors-to-decide-permanent-alimony-amount-bengaluru-techie-case-debate-101733962780059.html

 

[Azaad]

Atul Subhash suicide: After asking man to pay Rs 5 crore in an old divorce case, SC lists 8 factors to decide alimony

Atul Subhash suicide: After asking husband to pay Rs 5 crore, Supreme Court lists 8 factors to decide alimony amount

m.economictimes.com

Prima facie the higher judiciary shying away from enacting a framework for permanent settlement of alimony can only mean one thing - to keep the most lucrative of all gravy trains in forever motion for if the judiciary doesn't take care of its own , who will ?

 

[Miss Firing]

Supreme Court tells Haryana, UP govt to ‘completely ban’ firecrackers​

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/delhi-news/sc-tells-up-haryana-to-ban-firecrackers-101734631266415.html

A bench of justices Abhay S Oka and AG Masih emphasised that Delhi’s ban on firecrackers would be rendered ineffective unless neighbouring NCR states adopted similar prohibitions​

 

[Azaad]

Supreme Court tells Haryana, UP govt to ‘completely ban’ firecrackers​

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/delhi-news/sc-tells-up-haryana-to-ban-firecrackers-101734631266415.html

A bench of justices Abhay S Oka and AG Masih emphasised that Delhi’s ban on firecrackers would be rendered ineffective unless neighbouring NCR states adopted similar prohibitions​

Both governments should ask the Milaudas to go phuck themselves. Besides what are people going to burst firecrackers now for ? Christmas or New Year or pending Delhi assembly elections results ?

 

[crazywithmath]

Besides what are people going to burst firecrackers now for ? Christmas or New Year or pending Delhi assembly elections results ?

Yes, beyond a regular attempt at grabbing media headlines, this order is, again, a nothing burger.

 

[Azaad]

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/journey-more-important-than-reaching-cji-milestone-says-justice-nagarathna-101734933998755.html

Justice Nagarathna , daughter of former CJI Venkatramiah who was CJI in 1989 for around 6 months , currently 8th most senior judge in the SC in line to become CJI in 2027 for around a month .

Well well well , what do you know ?! Another Nepo Kid. Why do I get the feeling we'd be seeing more of this in the future such that it becomes a trend not an exception as it is today ?

 

[shade2]

Atul Subhash's wife gets child's custody, Supreme Court dismisses mother's plea

The Supreme Court has allowed Atul Subhash's wife, who was balmed by the techie in the suicide note he left behind, to have custody of their 4-year-old son.

www.indiatoday.in

Milaards strike again, the guy killed himself for nothing

 

[crazywithmath]

Atul Subhash's wife gets child's custody, Supreme Court dismisses mother's plea

The Supreme Court has allowed Atul Subhash's wife, who was balmed by the techie in the suicide note he left behind, to have custody of their 4-year-old son.

www.indiatoday.in

Milaards strike again, the guy killed himself for nothing

A certain gujju user and his übermansch mard underling got super pissed off when I wrote the same. Custody would anyway go to the mother (whenever she is out of prison, that is). The woman will likely suffer from 'judicial' harassments, keep visiting courts, struggle to find/maintain stable jobs and keep cursing her own self for the remainder of her life but all that hardly matters when the poor guy is no more.

 

[shade2]

A certain gujju user and his übermansch mard underling got super pissed off when I wrote the same. Custody would anyway go to the mother (whenever she is out of prison, that is). The woman will likely suffer from 'judicial' harassments, keep visiting courts, struggle to find/maintain stable jobs and keep cursing her own self for the remainder of her life but all that hardly matters when the poor guy is no more.

Life of your typical middle class guy has no value in the eyes of the meelards, if they guy didn't kill himself atleast *eventually* he would get to meet his son, max to max once the boy has grown up.

The boy now will be told how his father was an ebul male chauvinist loser and all.

 

[crazywithmath]

Life of your typical middle class guy has no value in the eyes of the meelards, if they guy didn't kill himself atleast *eventually* he would get to meet his son, max to max once the boy has grown up.

The boy now will be told how his father was an ebul male chauvinist loser and all.

I feel for the kid. Poor chap will likely be bullied by his present and future classmates for no fault of his.

As far as divorces and custodies are concerned, I think Shikhar Dhawan fought a terrific legal battle at courts. Going by the reports, Atul was quite loaded (the reason his wife went after him in the first place) - he could have fought a much better legal battle here. I watched his lawyer's interview - dude was fegning ignorance and basically talked crap of his own client in a very subtle roundabout fashion.

 

[silentassassin265]

I feel for the kid. Poor chap will likely be bullied by his present and future classmates for no fault of his.

As far as divorces and custodies are concerned, I think Shikhar Dhawan fought a terrific legal battle at courts. Going by the reports, Atul was quite loaded (the reason his wife went after him in the first place) - he could have fought a much better legal battle here. I watched his lawyer's interview - dude was fegning ignorance and basically talked crap of his own client in a very subtle roundabout fashion.

Pretty loaded doesn't mean he had good connection.
In such cases the result always favours whamen 99% of times

 

[crazywithmath]

Pretty loaded doesn't mean he had good connection.
In such cases the result always favours whamen 99% of times

I used that word because Indian judicial system is inherently elitist. You need to hire 'capable' lawyers to fight a battle (which costs a bit).

I don't want to go over this again but Atul's wife was periodically filing and withdrawing junk pleas across lower courts at regular intervals to 'harass' him. His lawyers kept turning a blind eye to it, did not bother to move to higher courts and the poor chap was made to attend hearings at faraway courts twice, sometimes thrice a week even though the accuser rarely showed up and the cases kept getting adjourned. It is a crime to file junk pleas, a good lawyer would make an example out of it - irrespective of the gender of the accuser.

And when the interviewers pressed his lawyer (by mentioning the details mentioned above) and asked why he did not consider moving to a higher court, he fumbled, deflected and even tried to put the blame on his own client, albeit in a subtle roundabout way.