Tracking Indian Judiciary: News, Updates & Discussions

m.economictimes.com

Atul Subhash suicide: After asking man to pay Rs 5 crore in an old divorce case, SC lists 8 factors to decide alimony

Atul Subhash suicide: After asking husband to pay Rs 5 crore, Supreme Court lists 8 factors to decide alimony amount
m.economictimes.com m.economictimes.com

Prima facie the higher judiciary shying away from enacting a framework for permanent settlement of alimony can only mean one thing - to keep the most lucrative of all gravy trains in forever motion for if the judiciary doesn't take care of its own , who will ?
 
Miss Firing said:

Supreme Court tells Haryana, UP govt to ‘completely ban’ firecrackers​



A bench of justices Abhay S Oka and AG Masih emphasised that Delhi’s ban on firecrackers would be rendered ineffective unless neighbouring NCR states adopted similar prohibitions​

Click to expand...
Both governments should ask the Milaudas to go phuck themselves. Besides what are people going to burst firecrackers now for ? Christmas or New Year or pending Delhi assembly elections results ?
 

Justice Nagarathna , daughter of former CJI Venkatramiah who was CJI in 1989 for around 6 months , currently 8th most senior judge in the SC in line to become CJI in 2027 for around a month .

Well well well , what do you know ?! Another Nepo Kid. Why do I get the feeling we'd be seeing more of this in the future such that it becomes a trend not an exception as it is today ?
 
shade2 said:
www.indiatoday.in

Atul Subhash's wife gets child's custody, Supreme Court dismisses mother's plea

The Supreme Court has allowed Atul Subhash's wife, who was balmed by the techie in the suicide note he left behind, to have custody of their 4-year-old son.
www.indiatoday.in www.indiatoday.in

Milaards strike again, the guy killed himself for nothing
Click to expand...

A certain gujju user and his übermansch mard underling got super pissed off when I wrote the same. Custody would anyway go to the mother (whenever she is out of prison, that is). The woman will likely suffer from 'judicial' harassments, keep visiting courts, struggle to find/maintain stable jobs and keep cursing her own self for the remainder of her life but all that hardly matters when the poor guy is no more.
 
crazywithmath said:
A certain gujju user and his übermansch mard underling got super pissed off when I wrote the same. Custody would anyway go to the mother (whenever she is out of prison, that is). The woman will likely suffer from 'judicial' harassments, keep visiting courts, struggle to find/maintain stable jobs and keep cursing her own self for the remainder of her life but all that hardly matters when the poor guy is no more.
Click to expand...

Life of your typical middle class guy has no value in the eyes of the meelards, if they guy didn't kill himself atleast *eventually* he would get to meet his son, max to max once the boy has grown up.

The boy now will be told how his father was an ebul male chauvinist loser and all.
 
shade2 said:
Life of your typical middle class guy has no value in the eyes of the meelards, if they guy didn't kill himself atleast *eventually* he would get to meet his son, max to max once the boy has grown up.

The boy now will be told how his father was an ebul male chauvinist loser and all.
Click to expand...
I feel for the kid. Poor chap will likely be bullied by his present and future classmates for no fault of his.

As far as divorces and custodies are concerned, I think Shikhar Dhawan fought a terrific legal battle at courts. Going by the reports, Atul was quite loaded (the reason his wife went after him in the first place) - he could have fought a much better legal battle here. I watched his lawyer's interview - dude was fegning ignorance and basically talked crap of his own client in a very subtle roundabout fashion.
 
crazywithmath said:
I feel for the kid. Poor chap will likely be bullied by his present and future classmates for no fault of his.

As far as divorces and custodies are concerned, I think Shikhar Dhawan fought a terrific legal battle at courts. Going by the reports, Atul was quite loaded (the reason his wife went after him in the first place) - he could have fought a much better legal battle here. I watched his lawyer's interview - dude was fegning ignorance and basically talked crap of his own client in a very subtle roundabout fashion.
Click to expand...
Pretty loaded doesn't mean he had good connection.
In such cases the result always favours whamen 99% of times
 
silentassassin265 said:
Pretty loaded doesn't mean he had good connection.
In such cases the result always favours whamen 99% of times
Click to expand...
I used that word because Indian judicial system is inherently elitist. You need to hire 'capable' lawyers to fight a battle (which costs a bit).

I don't want to go over this again but Atul's wife was periodically filing and withdrawing junk pleas across lower courts at regular intervals to 'harass' him. His lawyers kept turning a blind eye to it, did not bother to move to higher courts and the poor chap was made to attend hearings at faraway courts twice, sometimes thrice a week even though the accuser rarely showed up and the cases kept getting adjourned. It is a crime to file junk pleas, a good lawyer would make an example out of it - irrespective of the gender of the accuser.

And when the interviewers pressed his lawyer (by mentioning the details mentioned above) and asked why he did not consider moving to a higher court, he fumbled, deflected and even tried to put the blame on his own client, albeit in a subtle roundabout way.
 
Last edited:
What's stopping NIA from doing encounter
Azaad said:
www.livelaw.in

We Can't Hear You Endlessly: Delhi High Court Tells Prosecution In Bail Hearing Of Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid, & Others In Delhi Riots Case

While hearing bail pleas filed by Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid and other accused in connection with the 2020 North-East Delhi riots UAPA case, the Delhi High Court today (21 January) orally remarked...
www.livelaw.in www.livelaw.in

Stage is being set for the release on bail of Sharjeel Imam & Umer Khalid
Click to expand...
 
Anants said:
www.opindia.com

'Illegal religious conversion is not a serious crime like rape, murder': SC's opinion sparks debate, Maulvi gets bail

The court emphasized, “Bail should not be denied in cases where prolonged detention is unwarranted, especially when the nature of the allegations does not involve heinous crimes like murder or sexual assault.” | OpIndia News
www.opindia.com www.opindia.com
Click to expand...
Had that mentally challenged boy been from a religious minority like say a Parsi , pardiwala would've a broken fuse.
 
With cheap Deepseek AI in the vicinity. I think we can replace judges with AI, atleast it will work consistently compared to our mood swing milards.
 
trombone said:
indian men to keep a watch on wife's activities, else additional members will have to be added to his ration card.

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Man remains legal father of child born out of wife’s adultery: Supreme Court | Kochi News - The Times of India

The Supreme Court of India ruled that in cases where a marriage subsists and spouses have access to each other, the husband remains the legal father o
timesofindia.indiatimes.com timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Click to expand...
Clear case of judicial over reach by Milaudas. If I've understood the case right it was about establishing the paternity of the child not about maintenance of the child by the husband of the child's mother .

In the event the latter filed a maintenance claim filed on her paramour alleging him to be the father of her child as opposed to her legally wedded husband whom she subsequently divorced.

What's more while upholding the right of the paramour to not be submitted for a paternity test , the court's legally sanctioning cuckoldery by refusing a similar test to the husband by cooking up all kinds of scenarios in favour of upholding the child's rights while erecting barriers to prevent establishing paternity by the husband.

In other words it's the husband's responsibility whether he's the biological father or not to bear expenses of the child.
 
Azaad said:
Clear case of judicial over reach by Milaudas. If I've understood the case right it was about establishing the paternity of the child not about maintenance of the child by the husband of the child's mother .

In the event the latter filed a maintenance claim filed on her paramour alleging him to be the father of her child as opposed to her legally wedded husband whom she subsequently divorced.

What's more while upholding the right of the paramour to not be submitted for a paternity test , the court's legally sanctioning cuckoldery by refusing a similar test to the husband by cooking up all kinds of scenarios in favour of upholding the child's rights while erecting barriers to prevent establishing paternity by the husband.

In other words it's the husband's responsibility whether he's the biological father or not to bear expenses of the child.
Click to expand...
You have not noticed the worst part? They took 'inspiration' from the existing legal frameworks of the US, the UK and .
.
.
.
.
.
Malaysia! :bplease:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Tracking Stolen Indian Artifacts, Antiquities & Their Recovery/Return
Replies
1
Views
179
Miss Firing
M
haldilal
Indian Railways Disaster and Incidents tracking
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
Corvus Splendens
Corvus Splendens
haldilal
Chinese Disaster and Incidents Tracking
Replies
0
Views
47
haldilal
haldilal
Azaad
Tracking Crimes and Criminal activities in India.
2
Replies
25
Views
843
Azaad
Azaad
M
Natural Calamities, Accidents & Rescue Efforts Tracking
2
Replies
30
Views
1K
bakofbakchod
B

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Share this Site

Back
Top