- Joined
- Jul 2, 2024
- Messages
- 700
- Likes
- 1,871
F35 Case -> 2-3 Squardons (36-54 jets) for ~5 Bn
We can't integrate
BRAHM0S NG
Rudram 1/2/3
Astra 1/2/3
Saaw bombs
Gaurav bombs
So separate 2-3 Bn for Aim 160 , Aim 9x , jassm missile , ARM missile & SDB etc.
SO in toto 7-8 Bn for becoming a puppet in americucks hand
If we get even a single glitch/hardware trouble in Radar , sensor & Engine then F35 will be grounded for months and will only see sky after we paying some Billions
Inshort its Saar we want to drop bombs on porkistan saar....pls alow us saaar...we ukraine of Asia saar....
Su 57 case -> We rejected it 8 years ago....Import lobby who is always ready to import substandard shit were unhappy with su57....How bad su57 should have been to get rejected by Import lobby
Imo we should cancel TEDBF and go with Naval AMCA.
IAF might induct ~200 AMCA (reported by ANI)
IN wants 145 Jets for 3 carriers
So in TOTO 345 (AMCA + Naval AMCA) this will bring down unit cost and we can have production rate of ~36 Jets/year
AMCA will come before TEDBF
AMCA 1,600 GaN TRM radar is superior to f35 radar
AMCA F414 and future JV 110-120 Kn engine will be superior than ruski engines on su 57 "in terms of technology and overall MRO in service life"
Naval AMCA is capable of carrying 4 x Sea breaker antiship missile in its IWB Which IMO is world class payload for STOBAR Aircraft carriers
BDL signeddeal to produce sea breaker In india
IMO AMCA IWB & sea breaker are made for each other
View attachment 26207
View attachment 26208
In recent aeroindia ADA officials said PAYLOAD of AMCA IWB is 1,600 Kg....so 4 x Sea breaker antiship missile in IWB are perfect fit.....
no way current 4.5 gen TEDBF getting edge of j35 in 2035-2040....so go with Naval AMCA
You can even carry 2 x Rudram 3 or Brahm0s NG under wings (Externally)
Some news channels & media outlets are speculating that USA intentionally delayed F414 engines to stall AMCA & consider F-35 (downgraded, puppeted). As a side-effect the MWF & TEDBF will also get impacted.
After IN indicating 5gen TEDBF, anything can happen unles IN gives more details on its intentions. TEDBF's current version can get cancelled, heavily modified to 5gen or could be produced as LSP till 5gen TEDBF is available.
Bcoz our RAM & RAS R&D might have started in 2000s, so TEDBF could have been ATEDBF or NAMCA could have been designed. The existence of AMCA, F-35 & J-35 with identical airframe design, size, weight are also proof of concept. Not only 10s of 1000s of technical college students, but even the non-techies can understand this.

