First of all, naah Mate. I just try my best to learn things and whatever you see is the by-product.
Not limit, but there's not really any point of using these weapons. Especially considering the efforts it takes to make and deliver them. Cost is an issue too.
Really, like in any weapon you'd find one specific purpose for which it was designed. Let's say BrahMos; make an anti-ship missile that's quite hard to intercept. What's this for MOAB?
And even if there's one, how relevant it would be in tomorrow's conflict?
Let's say you want a large blast radius. With a MOAB weighing almost 10 tonnes you get a blast radius of around 2km.
For 10 tonnes you can carry 10, 1,000kg bombs each with a blast radius of around 300m. But with modern GPS kits you can carefully draw a grid of where each bomb would land. Like here's the blast radius of 1 MOAB compared to that of 10x Mk-84; both weighing 10t in total
View attachment 20897
But 10x smaller bombs gives you some advantages
• you don't need a specialized carrier, even a lightweight fighter can carry 2x 1,000kg bombs each
• you can assign bombs based on targets like a single bomb for a large area with multiple canvas tents but two bombs on the building that has command center. You don't get this level of planning with MOAB
• you can also use multiple warhead types like 2x bunker buster, 4x high explosive and 4x fragmentation. In MOAB it's just one thermobaric warhead