Making a dorito shaped jet doesn't automatically make it 6th gen, just saying.
What it looks like, its mostly a stealth bomber concept. I saw a twitter post saying it is manned/unmanned bomber concept.
The Su-57 is useless. Our only option right now is to finish AMCA in mission mode and make the first flight happen next year. Then seriously fund the engine program to get something usable out of it in 5 years.Do we have an option here ?
There is no way the US will give us the F35s to us without us handing over our kidneys and liver to them.
The US will ask for nothing less than giving them control over a few of our air force and naval bases.
Or else they would ask for the entire fleet of IAF's F35s to be operated and maintained by US personnel and billing us such hefty sums that the IAF won't be able to operate any other aircraft in its inventory.
That is too much of an oversimplification and mockery of a design that is being studied by both the US under NGAD and Europe under their own respective programs.
We are talking about a manned/unmanned fighter or bomber making it the second aircraft in the world after B-21 to do. We are talking about a new technological breakthrough in design with only the US operating such tailless jets in the form of b-2 and b-21.
From what we have as of now 3 engines would mean the chinese would end up having the first stealth jet in the world with this feature.
J-20 is rapidly improving and has recently flown with ws-15.
![]()
Pentagon: China Working on Upgrades to Top Stealth Fighter
China is upgrading its J-20 stealth fighter and experimenting with manned-unmanned teaming, the Pentagon's latest China report says.www.airandspaceforces.com
The pentagon does not underestimate it and neither should we.
All said and done this aircraft will be in testing for the next few years but that also means India’s chances of having a 5th gen aircraft before 2040 outside of imports is null.
Still this seems to be 5th gen only. There is no clear definition about 6th gen. Flying wing stealth bomber has been flying since 90s. Even our Ghatak will be FW design.
Using third auxiliary also tells that for all it's glitter China doesn't seem to have mere 100kN dry thrust low bypass engine yet.
But design is smart. It plans to reach within 500-1000km to the target using two main engines, and then probably use the third one to generate auxiliary power for EW suite to fly through a defended airspace.
The Su-57 is useless. Our only option right now is to finish AMCA in mission mode and make the first flight happen next year. Then seriously fund the engine program to get something usable out of it in 5 years.
Apart from India you mean? It's yours.. Britain. Tell us which is the next naval ship that is going to be axed?![]()
Crippling IAF gaps force government to set up panel for new road map | India News - The Times of India
India News: India's Air Force is facing a significant shortage of fighter jets and support aircraft. A high-level committee has been formed to address these gaps,timesofindia.indiatimes.com
In a country in which, IMO, procurement is severely hampered if not arguably crippled by bureaucracy and bureaucratic process, the solution to the problems so created is to set up another committee?
Apart from India you mean? It's yours.. Britain. Tell us which is the next naval ship that is going to be axed?
I'm British. I am also an analyst by profession. I am critical where I see failure. I criticise the British procurement system where I see failure, just as I criticise Indian procurement. The comparative magnitude of the incompetence of and in the two systems means that I criticise India more.Apart from India you mean? It's yours.. Britain. Tell us which is the next naval ship that is going to be axed?
Yep that's exactly what this county has to do. Go nuts. Cut the crap, the red tapes, and just full send. Nothing's impossible with enough national will. Otherwise we'll keep languishing between chai biskit sessions and MRFA scheme forever.Do you seriously think that a country that has not yet managed to induct a basic trainer like HTJ36 in 21 years since its first flight will manage to finish 5th gen AMCA project in record time?
Haha bad example, you should know how that ended for the USSR.View attachment 19660
At this rate they will throw America out of East Asia without firing a single bullet or missile
Like how the West did fuck all while USSR marched till East Germany, Czechoslovakia etc and refused to go back
Good on ya mate. Enjoy your criticizing Indian and tearing one's hair over British.. Hobby. EnjoyI'm British. I am also an analyst by profession. I am critical where I see failure. I criticise the British procurement system where I see failure, just as I criticise Indian procurement. The comparative magnitude of the incompetence of and in the two systems means that I criticise India more.
MCA laughs from somewhere within heap of discarded files at ADA. As india gains experience on Ghatak. Advanced\Revamped (for stealth) maybe feasible once again.. But the again its late night musingNaaah...I would stick with my FB-22 theory.
View attachment 19697
I just converted your post into a template which has been used in past and can be reused in foreseeable future tooyou cannot match China in terms of capability to capability them you have approach problem with what has China done to US in last 20 years - first invest and keep investing in domestic industry and alternative pick out tech from outside to undermine the strength of your opponent - pick limited number of <Insert Latest Russian/French/British vaporware of the era> and Rafael in another batch of 2 Sqds and keep the <insert advanced on paper project musing on ADA> on fast track , these desi corrupt babus in DRDO and HAL not reliable - pick PVt industry partners.
We've done enough of "they've done that, we're yet to do this" but as of now no-one seems interested in discussing what exactly it'd bring to the table and how this would be a challenge for us.
It is a challenge for us because the AMCA will be inducted in 2040while the Ching have finished catching up to Uncle Sam and are now equal-equal shoulder to shoulder working on next gen fighter jets.
Another 10 years and you'll find the Ching exceeding the Americans in even being "World's First" in military technology
We will still be here with grey in our hair, pulling out our hair over US engine delays, "kaveri kab ready hoga?" and whatever new MRFA type (((impoort tender))) they shit out.
Shelling money thinking you've an accurate reasoning to do so given the value you'd be getting...but then realising the values are suboptimal and you've overpaid.What does this metaphor "catfish" mean here?
Even if we ignore everything from shape, angle, surface finish then also the air intake itself of J-20/35 vastly surpasses that of Su-57. (Even with those janky grids)What do Russians have to say like what RCS are they quoting?
R-77s were an excellent missile when they're introduced in 1995 but then they kind of became stagnant. We've first hand experience of feeling the shortcomings of R-77, otherwise which country develops a BVR-AAM (Astra) before a WVR-AAM? Read about its problems in IAF serviceIn BVR, PL-15 Vs R-77M may have equal opportunity
A 30-15cm band radar would give you a vague idea of where a bogie might be but nothing more than than. For proper fire control you needed finer bandsSu-57 has side radar & L-band radar
In five days we'd be in 2025, no one's going to use WVR with their manned fighter anymore. It's foolish to even think about it when countries are working on AIM-174 type 400km ranged BVR-AAMs.In WVR, Su-57's DIRCM woud give advantage & in gunfight the Su-57 with its TVC & Levcons would kill J-20 most of the times or every time.
None of the parameters you mentioned are "generational gap defining" parameter that can't be replicated in previous generation fighters.I'm sharing a brief table i made for thread (Global 6th Generation Fighter Aircraft Projects)
Weird license raaj era mindset statment, especially when sh*t has already hit the fan and we want maximum contribution from our MIC+ to get whatever necessary.Private firms are coming up, but they should be given sub-systems only, not complete project. They have own challenges of profit, secrecy, security, corruption, etc.