- Joined
- Jul 4, 2024
- Messages
- 86
- Likes
- 405
View: https://youtu.be/7yCl_OYWwlg
Have heard AIM multiple times saying that the GE deal had slow engine delivery in their timeline.
On top of that potshot on HVT![]()
What did he say about HVT sir?
View: https://youtu.be/7yCl_OYWwlg
Have heard AIM multiple times saying that the GE deal had slow engine delivery in their timeline.
On top of that potshot on HVT![]()
That in the early 2010s he was a su57 simp when the project was scrapped, he became a Tejas simp!What did he say about HVT sir?
It can be quite useful in several scenarios and also might be one of the mandatory requirements for Tejas .How useful is this buddy buddy refueling? The babus are so stupid and stinging because all it does is tie up one useful combat plane for refueling when it could have been used for combat role
The purpose of the Su-30 is primarily for defensive operations. It will engage targets while staying within the country's territory, similar to its role in Operation Swift Retort. For offensive operations beyond the Line of Control (LoC), a different platform would be required. Since it operates within the territory, it can also be used for buddy refueling.How useful is this buddy buddy refueling? The babus are so stupid and stinging because all it does is tie up one useful combat plane for refueling when it could have been used for combat role
I really feel pity for Su 30 MKi. It’s been used as buddy refuller mini AWACS and what not. IAF should buy the tankers and AWACS and stop flexing these side gigs.
The purpose of the Su-30 is primarily for defensive operations. It will engage targets while staying within the country's territory, similar to its role in Operation Swift Retort. For offensive operations beyond the Line of Control (LoC), a different platform would be required. Since it operates within the territory, it can also be used for buddy refueling.
The purpose of the Su-30 is primarily for defensive operations. It will engage targets while staying within the country's territory, similar to its role in Operation Swift Retort. For offensive operations beyond the Line of Control (LoC), a different platform would be required. Since it operates within the territory, it can also be used for buddy refueling.
Balakot anniversary so..posted ...You are just 6 years late in posting this.
Speaking at a seminar hosted by the Chanakya Forum, ACM Singh emphasised that India must explore collaborative projects between foreign firms and Indian private players to produce fighter aircraft domestically, supplementing the state-run Hindustan Aeronautics Limited’s (HAL) production of the Tejas Mk-1A.
You're not reading the situation right.![]()
IAF chief drops truth bombs, says his force in dire need of 35-40 aircraft/year, far behind in tech
Speaking at an event, Air Chief Marshal AP Singh also made a strong pitch for collaborative project between a foreign firm & Indian pvt player to produce fighter aircraft in India.theprint.in
>Dassault order backlog is full apart from that no domestic partner
>EuroFighter no domestic partner
>Gripen no domestic partner
>No chance of Ruskals
>We already have Ruskal version of F-15
Meanwhile Tata-LM already produce F-16 wings in country and i'm sure they can scale up production for 114 fighters, also this will lead to "a possible path to F-35" too.
I can see HF-24 Marut from Heaven saying "Come beta, join me" to Tejas![]()