Indian Air Force: News & Discussions

[randombully]

Sole certainty : Su57 bird range > Rafale range.
For the rest we try to compare orange and strawberry. A heavy fighter and a light medium one.
Better to try to compare SCAF and Su-57.

One of the strong points of rafale is how much lift it generates, how much payload it can carry and how much range it gives for being relatively compact jet.
All three things desirable for naval jet, specially stobar one.
But that smaller nose cone was a bad decision.
Being twin engine it has potential to power a more powerful radar, somewhere between 1300-1600 gan trm Size radar.

That's also where the design of tedbf shined, maintaining strong suits of rafale but much wider node cone.
Tho for 2038 timeline, it needs to become fucking stealthified with IWB.

 

[Migflug]

View attachment 26717
View attachment 26718

View: https://x.com/elmihiro/status/1896962965636776447?t=emwoWW62LE22KHSePi33kQ&s=19

We can have the prototype ready by next year. All that is needed is vision

 

[Asmodeus]

Grp. Cpt. Girish Dantale just called the F-35 trap @5:50... lol


View: https://youtu.be/8mWCWWziVLo?si=BwGRR8rkuDv3HYFs

 

[silentassassin265]

View: https://x.com/elmihiro/status/1896962965636776447?t=emwoWW62LE22KHSePi33kQ&s=19

We can have the prototype ready by next year. All that is needed is vision

Why not just throw it using atags

 

[maximus777]

View attachment 26730

And all modern solutions start with

 

[maximus777]

Why not just throw it using atags

While we are exploring options, how about this?

 

[jaijaganath]

View: https://x.com/ajitkdubey/status/1897475114037600625

 

[Migflug]

View: https://x.com/ajitkdubey/status/1897475114037600625

So MRFA will at best happen by 2030 and we will be buying a foreign 4.5th gen at $250 a pop throughout the 2030s when many nations would have started to induct 6th gen. Our AMCA would probably have started the production and we would be needing another "STOPGAP" for the 6th gen threat.

 

[randombully]

View: https://youtu.be/iyselry8LCI?feature=shared

 

[BON PLAN]

yes, both are of different weight classes, but the cost is the ultimate decider. And the Rafale is more costly than the Su57. So, from an ROI perspective, they are in the same league, hence the comparison.
FYI, given the high per-unit cost of Rafale & its weapons and the high opex of Su57, I am assuming the LTC won't be much different.

No, cost is not the sole point.
-availability (russian jets have a far less availability than west jets, and Rafale is high in this field : nearly 90% reach in IAF).
-lifetime (russian engines life are poor).
-efficiency (russian jets in ukraine were not impressive).
-independance (US weapon can't be used as you like (ask Egypt or UAE...) )
-weapons range, availability of spare parts, ...
etc....

 

[BON PLAN]

One of the strong points of rafale is how much lift it generates, how much payload it can carry and how much range it gives for being relatively compact jet.
All three things desirable for naval jet, specially stobar one.
But that smaller nose cone was a bad decision.
Being twin engine it has potential to power a more powerful radar, somewhere between 1300-1600 gan trm Size radar.

That's also where the design of tedbf shined, maintaining strong suits of rafale but much wider node cone.
Tho for 2038 timeline, it needs to become fucking stealthified with IWB.

It seems to have a small nose cone because, from front, the frame with the big air intakes seems large.

But sure it may be better to have a greater radar. always bigger radar, always more thrust... at the end you have a F22 or a Su57, with the associate costs !

 

[randombully]

No, cost is not the sole point.
-availability (russian jets have a far less availability than west jets, and Rafale is high in this field : nearly 90% reach in IAF).
-lifetime (russian engines life are poor).
-efficiency (russian jets in ukraine were not impressive).
-independance (US weapon can't be used as you like (ask Egypt or UAE...) )
-weapons range, availability of spare parts, ...
etc....

It seems to have a small nose cone because, from front, the frame with the big air intakes seems large.

But sure it may be better to have a greater radar. always bigger radar, always more thrust... at the end you have a F22 or a Su57, with the associate costs !

rafale as fighter jet without any other changes can easily use a 1200-1400 GaAs trm radar, even more with GaN.
But it's stuck at less then 900 trm.
You Don't need more thrust, new engines.
Etc
Even single engine gripen e has somewhat bigger radar.
Eurofighter, j10c all have bigger radar, single engine tejas mk1a has slightly bigger radar, so will mk2.
Now it's not that radar is two small, but it is on a smaller side, especially when rafale's twin m88 can easily power a bigger radar with 1200-1400 trm.
It's a wasted potential.
They should really resign the front nose section to be bigger for f5.

 

[Azaad]

So MRFA will at best happen by 2030 and we will be buying a foreign 4.5th gen at $250 a pop throughout the 2030s when many nations would have started to induct 6th gen. Our AMCA would probably have started the production and we would be needing another "STOPGAP" for the 6th gen threat.

OTOH , there's this requirement of 36 nos Rafales due & OTOH there's this obsession of IAF for the MRFA with local production with a Pvt Sector Player in order to set up another mfg agency to break up HAL's monopoly against a backdrop of falling squadron strength & an imminent war against the Chinese by the end of the decade.

Then there's the issue of financing all these endeavours apart from the indigenous programs we're undertaking without adversely affecting them.

Only God knows how will we juggle so many balls at once .