Valid argument but there are some nuances
Yes but what are "these" boats? There are 5,00,000 boats, about which exactly are you talking
A wooden fishing trawler? Then you're absolutely correct in your assessment.
A Sucha-II class patrol ship of the coast guard? It has a reported range of more than 10,000km
There was reason why I excluded 4,98,000 ships and mentioned just 2,000 instead of outright saying China has half a million boats. Or why I counted just Maritime Safety Administration, Coast Guard, Aux Fleet and Maritime Transport Border Defence and excluded things like Ministry of Transport, Scientific Vessels and Maritime Militia.
Because by reducing the number to I don't know, maybe 1% we can kind of filter out most of the low endurance vessels. Again I'm not saying that all 2,500 of these vessels would be able to go as far away as mainland America because this number would definitely include some things like inshore patrol vessels; but it would be way smaller in terms of percentage.
Since yesterday I'm playing the devil's advocate for PLA-N but as of now only mentioned ships like 55s and 52s...and completely ignored those Type 22s. Those are tiny, fast, carries 8x AShMs but perhaps the most dangerous stats is the fact that China has more than 80 of those.
Endurance was the primary reason why I excluded them, followed by the fact that they've a comical air defence.
So yeah, I'm well aware of this endurance point that you're trying to highlight.
Exactly
And that was the whole point for bringing this specific topic, they've quite a robust support element.