arbitrary policies like the Agniveer scheme , the measly increase in defence budgets after our showdown with China in 2017 & especially after 2020 , the absolute refusal to either entrust entire CI operations including C&C along with the budget & identification of a force reporting to the Home Ministry, after due training & equipping it like for instance the CRPF or alternatively detach the RR from the IA & dedicate this formation for CI leaving the IA to focus on war fighting among others will rank right at the top of my list .
- agniveer scheme comes from kargil review committee report. any gormint that takes it up, there would have been a pushback since it's a structural reform. there would some group or the other that would not be happy with some part of it.
- on defence budgets, coupta is dumbing down the problem statement. let's take the case of BPJs and helmets, MKU helmet order was about 170-180 crore, not a big amount as such, if budget is the only issue, how is it that even after 8 years we are still discussing BPJs and helmets for infantry. the helmets we see now, the order was given before doklam happened. for that order to be given, DAP was modified in 2016. first lot BPJ order was given in 2018, feedback was that it was too heavy. RFI was again released in 2022. same goes for each and every defence item that has been ordered since 2014/15. time needed for feedback loops need to be factored in, is my point. it seems to be the case that, time taken for some of the processes can't be sped up beyond a point with in the forces and development agencies.
from a defence enthusiast's perspective one might get caught up in daily details, step back and look at the range of items we are tracking as parallel procurement processes for past few years, from bpj, helmets, assault rifles, grenades, uniforms, vehicles (light and heavy), tanks, SDR, NVG, transport and fighter aircraft, missile(all categories) etc.. this is an entire spectrum of change that is happening.
- didn't get this CI/CT point. need more info on timeline and specifics. if this is coming under operational planning, there is nothing much we can infer since those decisions are not political in nature, co-ordination handled at DGMO, secretary and joint secretary level.
- and lastly, i hope it is nobody's case that there are ready made solutions for every problem/feedback that comes up. for established procedures maybe, but when fundamentals themselves are undergoing a change, may be not.