Indian Special Forces

Have you seen the IWI suppressors that are supplied with these tavors ? They turn these things into artillery guns in terms of barrel length
If a man wishes to remain silent, he should really use a suppressor
There are good option for suppressor on tavor 21/ x 95 i am not sure why our Bois don't use it


View: https://youtu.be/iCxWHWJTfRI?si=UpC5XsGcAn40TXuB
(I also forwarded more videos of suppressed x 95/tavor 21 from reddit in other thread)
 
There are good option for suppressor on tavor 21/ x 95 i am not sure why our Bois don't use it


View: https://youtu.be/iCxWHWJTfRI?si=UpC5XsGcAn40TXuB
(I also forwarded more videos of suppressed x 95/tavor 21 from reddit in other thread)

Over-gassed gun, internals will wear out faster. The X-95 has an adjustable gas block, but even the "suppressed" setting is hotter than desirable. Forget the TARs and SARs, you eat a face full of gas which is not pleasant.
1731950692406.webp1731951194303.webp
Only flow-through suppressors would work. You won't catch gas in the face and it's easier on the internals. But they are louder than common baffle type designs.

1731950811213.webp

A quick glance at Indian Army's budget tells you that Rifles wearing out faster is a big no no. Americans have no problem eating through cans and barrels on their new .277 Fury rifles.
 
Over-gassed gun, internals will wear out faster. The X-95 has an adjustable gas block, but even the "suppressed" setting is hotter than desirable. Forget the TARs and SARs, you eat a face full of gas which is not pleasant.
View attachment 15731View attachment 15733
Only flow-through suppressors would work. You won't catch gas in the face and it's easier on the internals. But they are louder than common baffle type designs.

View attachment 15732

A quick glance at Indian Army's budget tells you that Rifles wearing out faster is a big no no. Americans have no problem eating through cans and barrels on their new .277 Fury rifles.

Over-gassed gun, internals will wear out faster. The X-95 has an adjustable gas block, but even the "suppressed" setting is hotter than desirable. Forget the TARs and SARs, you eat a face full of gas which is not pleasant.
View attachment 15731View attachment 15733
Only flow-through suppressors would work. You won't catch gas in the face and it's easier on the internals. But they are louder than common baffle type designs.

View attachment 15732

A quick glance at Indian Army's budget tells you that Rifles wearing out faster is a big no no. Americans have no problem eating through cans and barrels on their new .277 Fury rifles.
Suppresser is useful but even if we ignore rifle wearing out part cost and fact that under thermal/nvg suppressor is easily visible and it actually sparks so for our case i think a good muzzle device is sufficient
 
talking about NSG, Chinese PAP:

View attachment 15742

Commies get a lot of flak here and many like to pretend that jugaad and josh will win the day but these guys aren’t sitting still. This setup is superior to ANY Indian unit has ever been seen with- he’s even handling his weapon appropriately
Their drills have got better and their equipment are better quality than before plus they can mass produce at cheaper rates.
 
talking about NSG, Chinese PAP:

View attachment 15742

Commies get a lot of flak here and many like to pretend that jugaad and josh will win the day but these guys aren’t sitting still. This setup is superior to ANY Indian unit has ever been seen with- he’s even handling his weapon appropriately
That kit is privately purchased not standard
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241119_115939_Reddit.webp
    Screenshot_20241119_115939_Reddit.webp
    100.9 KB · Views: 42
talking about NSG, Chinese PAP:

View attachment 15742

Commies get a lot of flak here and many like to pretend that jugaad and josh will win the day but these guys aren’t sitting still. This setup is superior to ANY Indian unit has ever been seen with- he’s even handling his weapon appropriately
What's stopping NSG from making PR hitpieces like these ? Availibility of kit is not an issue, get a 12 man squad with the best shit on.
 
@rkhanna Here's a familiarisation phase photo from Mallet Strike 24

Actually I realised my original Comment was out of context to the Picture I was refering to.

What i meant was that the Americans will never operate with anyones elses weapons. A Familiarization Day to test out and feel out partner forces weapons is different from what i meant.

Also a NATO Joint Readiness or an OPFOR Exercise is also different THOUGH (rom what I have been told ) on big Manouevers the Americans tend to revert back to their own systems.

Generally Speaking the Americans demand Interoperability towards themselves - not the other way around.

Anyways - moot point
 
Suppresser is useful but even if we ignore rifle wearing out part cost and fact that under thermal/nvg suppressor is easily visible and it actually sparks so for our case i think a good muzzle device is sufficient

Optics can pick up the Soldier as well not just the Thermal Signature of the Suppressor. That being Said this is not a "New" Problem and yet Suppressors roam the battlefield I think there are a number of Thermal Covering/sleeves solutions available to reduce the glow as well.

A Suppressor adds many more benefits to a soldier and a Small Unit
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top