Indian Special Forces

Have you seen the IWI suppressors that are supplied with these tavors ? They turn these things into artillery guns in terms of barrel length
If a man wishes to remain silent, he should really use a suppressor
There are good option for suppressor on tavor 21/ x 95 i am not sure why our Bois don't use it


View: https://youtu.be/iCxWHWJTfRI?si=UpC5XsGcAn40TXuB
(I also forwarded more videos of suppressed x 95/tavor 21 from reddit in other thread)
 
There are good option for suppressor on tavor 21/ x 95 i am not sure why our Bois don't use it


View: https://youtu.be/iCxWHWJTfRI?si=UpC5XsGcAn40TXuB
(I also forwarded more videos of suppressed x 95/tavor 21 from reddit in other thread)

Over-gassed gun, internals will wear out faster. The X-95 has an adjustable gas block, but even the "suppressed" setting is hotter than desirable. Forget the TARs and SARs, you eat a face full of gas which is not pleasant.
1731950692406.webp1731951194303.webp
Only flow-through suppressors would work. You won't catch gas in the face and it's easier on the internals. But they are louder than common baffle type designs.

1731950811213.webp

A quick glance at Indian Army's budget tells you that Rifles wearing out faster is a big no no. Americans have no problem eating through cans and barrels on their new .277 Fury rifles.
 
Over-gassed gun, internals will wear out faster. The X-95 has an adjustable gas block, but even the "suppressed" setting is hotter than desirable. Forget the TARs and SARs, you eat a face full of gas which is not pleasant.
View attachment 15731View attachment 15733
Only flow-through suppressors would work. You won't catch gas in the face and it's easier on the internals. But they are louder than common baffle type designs.

View attachment 15732

A quick glance at Indian Army's budget tells you that Rifles wearing out faster is a big no no. Americans have no problem eating through cans and barrels on their new .277 Fury rifles.

Over-gassed gun, internals will wear out faster. The X-95 has an adjustable gas block, but even the "suppressed" setting is hotter than desirable. Forget the TARs and SARs, you eat a face full of gas which is not pleasant.
View attachment 15731View attachment 15733
Only flow-through suppressors would work. You won't catch gas in the face and it's easier on the internals. But they are louder than common baffle type designs.

View attachment 15732

A quick glance at Indian Army's budget tells you that Rifles wearing out faster is a big no no. Americans have no problem eating through cans and barrels on their new .277 Fury rifles.
Suppresser is useful but even if we ignore rifle wearing out part cost and fact that under thermal/nvg suppressor is easily visible and it actually sparks so for our case i think a good muzzle device is sufficient
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top