Indo-China Border & LAC

[mist_consecutive]

View: https://x.com/Mukambo1987/status/1850578301242290677

Chinese seething on weibo regarding patrolling rights

 

[Bleh]

> CNN (Anti-India)
> Article from April (Not updated information)

What's next ? You are going to tell me that Afghanistan, Palestine & Somalia are happier than India because your gora masters reported it (toh sahi hi hoga na !).

Listen buddy, I am the best source of information on Indo-China border unless you physically go to inspect the borders yourself. Why ? Because I have been looking at satellite images since the conflict started in 2020.

Now, whether you choose to believe me, Indian Army, or Indian news sources is upto you. I cannot force you to believe something.

Both the information you posted about Doklam, as well as Ladakh disengagement is false and/or misinterpreted.

Oke

 

[MasterChief]

View: https://x.com/Mukambo1987/status/1850578301242290677

Chinese seething on weibo regarding patrolling rights

DFI China thread on bad days was like this only.. Sem2Sem..

 

[MasterChief]

>Ah San
We should exclusively call them AFEEMCHI here on this board, Chinku and variations don't have the same punch

View attachment 13410


View attachment 13411

How about G*ndsung Li ?
From a joke i heard in my child hood ..

 

[TopWatcher]

Kisi ko bhi clear nahin hai, hua kya actually.

Just making story dont work.

 

[Azaad]

Rohit Vats summing up the various podcasts he's done on this topic at his YT channel . For those who may want to recapitulate.


View: https://twitter.com/KesariDhwaj/status/1849434895367770366?s=19

 

[Azaad]

View: https://twitter.com/KesariDhwaj/status/1850107732923396104?s=19

 

[hurrians]

"China is seen as easier to work with from Delhi’s perspective, compared to countries such as Japan and South Korea which tend to treat India as a junior partner, analysts say"

India-China thaw driven by economic, security interests, experts say

Move to resume border patrols implies both countries are motivated to improve relations through peaceful and political means, analysts note.

www.scmp.com

 

[crazywithmath]

"China is seen as easier to work with from Delhi’s perspective, compared to countries such as Japan and South Korea which tend to treat India as a junior partner, analysts say"

Press X to doubt.

Also, SCMP has been neutered; no wonder they are publishing articles like this.

 

[mist_consecutive]

Army does ‘physical verification’ of Chinese pullout from Depsang, 'escorted patrolling' mooted in East

First patrol since January 2020 in Depsang Plains will start this week. It's understood that Army will carry out patroling to PP 10, 11, 12, 12A & 13.

theprint.in

WHAT THE FUCK ?
We agreed to Chinese patrolling in Yangtse area

Absolute MORONS these babus are ! There is no, absolutely no strategic value for us in Depsang, (Raki Nala & beyond), patrolling it is little more than ego massaging and joyride.

Giving up control of Chumi Gyatse - Yangtse area for Depsang is like trading 1 acre of land in Thar desert for 1 acre of land in Chanakyapuri in Delhi.

Army knows there is no value in Depsang, it is barren land with no strategic future. Army is super-sensitive about Yangtse in Tawang. I strongly doubt the idiots in MEA & GoI must have shoved this deal down the throat of Army.

 

[Ultraman]

Army does ‘physical verification’ of Chinese pullout from Depsang, 'escorted patrolling' mooted in East

First patrol since January 2020 in Depsang Plains will start this week. It's understood that Army will carry out patroling to PP 10, 11, 12, 12A & 13.

theprint.in

WHAT THE FUCK ?
We agreed to Chinese patrolling in Yangtse area

Absolute MORONS these babus are ! There is no, absolutely no strategic value for us in Depsang, (Raki Nala & beyond), patrolling it is little more than ego massaging and joyride.

Giving up control of Chumi Gyatse - Yangtse area for Depsang is like trading 1 acre of land in Thar desert for 1 acre of land in Chanakyapuri in Delhi.

Army knows there is no value in Depsang, it is barren land with no strategic future. Army is super-sensitive about Yangtse in Tawang. I strongly doubt the idiots in MEA & GoI must have shoved this deal down the throat of Army.

"understanding has also been reached for allowing “escorted patrolling” of the Chinese in the contested Yangtse region of Arunachal Pradesh’s Tawang and possibly in one more area."

lol . we will give guided tours to pla . still nothing compared to them removing everything along pp10-pp13 in depsang


fuck i hope we dont remove any posts or that long ass rock wall there

this is probably the location they are talking about , that wall above the water fall


View: https://x.com/Diago4035541471/status/1850866329491833313


View: https://x.com/Diago4035541471/status/1850866329491833313

 

[mist_consecutive]

"understanding has also been reached for allowing “escorted patrolling” of the Chinese in the contested Yangtse region of Arunachal Pradesh’s Tawang and possibly in one more area."

lol . we will give guided tours to pla . still nothing compared to them removing everything along pp10-pp13 in depsang


fuck i hope we dont remove any posts or that long ass rock wall there

this is probably the location they are talking about , that wall above the water fall


View: https://x.com/Diago4035541471/status/1850866329491833313


View: https://x.com/Diago4035541471/status/1850866329491833313

Oh hell no, we will also be basically having escorted patrols in Raki-nala and beyond. As of 25th China only dismantled the forward post at Y-junction and moved back their equipments. Everything apart from that (permanent infra) in DBO to Depsang all remains.

I don't see how they will dismantle almost billion $ of infrastructure built. This is a sham. In contrast Chinese are too salty that we captured Chumi Gyatse and Yangtse and they try every year to get it back.

Once they get easy access to the area I bet they will attack with full force & surprise to snatch that area from us. I mean its not even strategically deep, only 250 meters from LAC, an infantryman can make a run for it.

 

[mist_consecutive]

View: https://x.com/sneheshphilip/status/1850942303579619513

Forget Bottleneck, forget Raki Nala, PP10-PP13 has no strategic value, China already heavily dominates the area.

We are trading our rooks for their pawns and being happy.

 

[Azaad]

In the short term , looks like 56" is giving priority to dhandho , hence the agreement on the LAC to clear the way for economic ties to improve.

In the long term , well in the long term , we're all dead. That apart , hope the realisation in all quarters is this is the final agreement before the final reckoning , whenever that is.

 

[Ultraman]

View: https://x.com/sneheshphilip/status/1850942303579619513

Forget Bottleneck, forget Raki Nala, PP10-PP13 has no strategic value, China already heavily dominates the area.

We are trading our rooks for their pawns and being happy.

good news that they didnt build a road from their side of LAC east of depsang bulge to bottle neck

that would have given them another route to cut dbdso road .

so far no news of our patrols in depsang being escorted ?


no news of our posts being removed in yangste . i am happy with IA giving tours to PLA

 

[crazywithmath]

View: https://x.com/sneheshphilip/status/1850942303579619513

Forget Bottleneck, forget Raki Nala, PP10-PP13 has no strategic value, China already heavily dominates the area.

We are trading our rooks for their pawns and being happy.

What exactly does this 'guided patrolling' drama acheieve (since the ground reality does not change one bit)? Apart from some cheap photo ops and maybe some kanging over muh BRICS and shiet, that is?

 

[mist_consecutive]

good news that they didnt build a road from their side of LAC east of depsang bulge to bottle neck

that would have given them another route to cut dbdso road .

so far no news of our patrols in depsang being escorted ?


no news of our posts being removed in yangste . i am happy with IA giving tours to PLA

I don't think our post will be removed, more like we will allow Chinese patrols to pass. But the challenge is they can use this excuse to gather intel and attack our posts. These forward posts are manned by hardly 15-20 mens and they just need to intrude some 250-odd meters which is not really hard at all.

What exactly does this 'guided patrolling' drama acheieve (since the ground reality does not change one bit)? Apart from some cheap photo ops and maybe some kanging over muh BRICS and shiet, that is?

Chinese don't harbour any such illusions. Their ulterior motive is capturing Yangtse area, and they have tried multiple times and failed miserably. Allowing them access is like allowing a hungry wolf passage to cattle pen. There are no good end-result.

Their motives are crystal-clear, only shit-brained bureaucrats sitting at their AC office trying to appease BJP can't see this.

 

[MasterChief]

Oh hell no, we will also be basically having escorted patrols in Raki-nala and beyond. As of 25th China only dismantled the forward post at Y-junction and moved back their equipments. Everything apart from that (permanent infra) in DBO to Depsang all remains.

I don't see how they will dismantle almost billion $ of infrastructure built. This is a sham. In contrast Chinese are too salty that we captured Chumi Gyatse and Yangtse and they try every year to get it back.

Once they get easy access to the area I bet they will attack with full force & surprise to snatch that area from us. I mean its not even strategically deep, only 250 meters from LAC, an infantryman can make a run for it.

When was it that IA captured Chumi Gyatse and Yangtse ?

 

[mist_consecutive]

China can back out of LAC agreement. India shouldn't be lulled into a false sense of security

Given the Chinese penchant for saying one thing and doing the exact opposite, we must approach these latest developments, however good they might seem, with abundant caution.

theprint.in

 

[mist_consecutive]

When did we capture Chumi Gyatse and Yangtse ?

In 1986-87, as a tit-for-tat for Chinese capturing Sumdorong-Chu pasture (Yangtse area).

Sumdorong Chu standoff - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This info might come as a surprise for chronic bho$dapiller lurkers on this forum who think we only lost territory to China and their big daddy China is invincible.