Neither did I.
My point was very simple. India had established
65 patrolling points to ensure presence along OUR understanding of LAC (in
red, which is quite a bit beyond the LAC you're used to seeing on international maps) access to
26 of which was blocked in 2020... A very simple question.
How many of them we've regains access to? No more than 6 by my present understanding. You're welcome to prove me wrong. But until then it means that we've made no solid gains & the "buffer" areas mostly lie on our understanding of LAC
even if it's only the Chinese are the ones pulling back, because they were originally on the west side of the red line enforcing the black-dotted LAC line! Which it isn't, because both are moving back. That's worse.
What have we conceded?.. we've let them in areas previously in our sole control to try to do another Galwan after 10 years.
I predicted exactly this even before these recent news were out. SO HOW WAS I WRONG?
View attachment 13757
We should be refusing to disengage until they moved back to 1959 pre-war seperation line (in
blue) rejecting to recognise any line established by violence against us.