Indo-China Border & LAC

PCL181, fast produced from 2020, around 600 in 5 yrs.

Deployed in Tibet area.

View attachment 13841

View attachment 13842


View attachment 13843


View attachment 13844

View attachment 13845
PLA operating MGS or Rocket Artillery in Tibet is a huge problem for Tibet is a plateau which means flat terrain which further means no place to hide or run as opposed to the Indian side of the LAC which is mostly ridges & valleys .

Further , each such PLA unit must be guarded by an equivalent anti drone unit as well as it'd be that much more vulnerable as well .
 
Geopolitical Tensions over China’s Mega Dam on the Brahmaputra

Is it a folly or simply over-engineering?

China, known for its strategic maneuvering, is attempting construction of a mega dam, valued between $100 billion on a bend of the Brahmaputra River in Tibet, near the Indian border. The Brahmaputra, a river fed primarily by glacier melt, runs along the northern side of the Himalayas at an elevation of 4,000 to 3,000 meters. Since the Tibetan Plateau sees little rainfall, the river’s flow in this region is mostly a snowmelt. Researchers estimate that only 25 to 33% of the river’s flow in the Assam plains originates in Tibet, while the remaining 65% comes from rainfall in Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Assam, and surrounding regions. Initially, one might think the dam poses little threat, particularly as it is an inflow dam, with no water is diverted, however, yet concerns rise during the dry season, when the river’s discharge naturally decreases. Moreover, if there is not much flow in the river then Chinese are planning to use water head (difference in elevation) to generate massive amount of electricity. Without enough hydrological data, my guess is that head alone cannot generate that amount of electricity (60 GigaWatts).

China’s ambition to build this dam in such a hazardous location—an earthquake-prone river bend where the river drops 2,500 meters—raises serious questions. The area is highly vulnerable to landslides and other natural disasters. China’s confidence seems rooted in two factors: the availability of labor following the failure of housing projects and failed Belt and Road Initiatives.

The Brahmaputra Dam would be an unprecedented engineering challenge, as the river flows through the world’s deepest known canyon at the bend. China’s plan is to harness the steep 2,500-meter drop to generate power—three times the capacity of the Three Gorges Dam—by constructing three 35-kilometer tunnels beneath the Himalayan slopes. These tunnels would bypass the river’s natural curve, funneling water to turbines on the other side. To feed the turbines, China would build a massive reservoir to store water and release it through the tunnels. However, the region’s geological instability, compounded by the weight of billions of tons of water, could trigger earthquakes, creating a significant risk. Despite these concerns, China appears undeterred.

Why is India Concerned?

China’s construction of the Brahmaputra dam could elevate it to the status of an “upstream superpower,” giving it control over the water supply to downstream nations like India and Bangladesh. Without a formal water-sharing agreement or basin-wide management system, China’s intentions remain suspect. Although earlier reports suggested that China aimed to divert water to its dry regions 3,000 km away, this does not seem to be the case today. Nevertheless, China’s long-term motives are always a suspect.

Another major Indian concern is the potential impact on farming in the Assam plains. The fast-flowing Brahmaputra deposits nutrient-rich soil in these plains, supporting agriculture. A dam would disrupt this natural process. Additionally, the dam could face its own challenges, with sediment building up in the reservoir and potentially blocking the tunnels. That is China’s problem.

Bangladesh, the other downstream country, appears less vocal on the issue. Given its close ties with China, Bangladesh might prefer to look the other way, minimizing any public concerns.

One significant risk is the possibility that China could deliberately release large amounts of water during the rainy season, potentially flooding the Assam plains. To counter this threat, India plans to build an $8 billion dam in Arunachal Pradesh, which would store excess water and release it during the dry season—a promising idea. Additionally, Chinese dam could also complicate India’s plans to link the Brahmaputra with other rivers via the Siliguri Corridor, an idea that has not yet been seriously considered. During any future negotiations over a basin-wide agreement, this project should be addressed and agreed upon. What it means is that when India speaks, China has to listen. Those previous days of Chinese domination are over.}
1730473386396.png1730473386419.png
 
Now that Chinese have retreated from two choke points in Ladakh. There is no significance of these points but it was matter of prestige that you are occupying these points with deceit and should vacate, preferably without a fire fight. Patrolling to the peaks thru these points in Despang or grazing Yaks in Demchok is of no strategic significance, but if you want to pick up a fight then that is where you started that is block passage.

The whole world knew that it was stupid and foolish fight but Chinese continued.

Then came the US pressure on China to submit. The Chinese were picking up fights in China sea in the area of U.S. influence (Taiwan, Japan, Philippines etc.). The U.S. wanted China to keep their hands away. Hence sooner than later a fight will ensue. China alone cannot match up to US and combined power of US, Taiwan, Japan and all eastern neighbours hence they began to think which is a greater evil. Is it India or China sea powers backed by US.

It is not hard to conclude that China has nothing to gain in Himalayan peaks. To this they were helped by Russian pressure who is fighting a war in Ukraine, that China relent on its fight with India over nothings and present a unified face at the BRICKS Conference in Russia.

It is likely that Chinese were thinking the same but the Russian pressure helped to give up, hence came the Chinese withdrawal from the two choke points.

It is victory to Modi for his relentless diplomacy to persuade Chinese to leave without a firefight.

Bad news for US as now China can concentrate on anti US front in the China Sea. Also confused Pakistanis will be more bankrupt as they would begin to spend more on war hardware.
 
Now you can gauge why despite strategic guidance from top leaders it took years to disengage , if xi is facing heat from Taiwan / diaspora just imagine what will moodiji face if all details are known.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top