OkIt's still false. 36/40 are delivered and lots of them delivered in last 9-10 years.
OkIt's still false. 36/40 are delivered and lots of them delivered in last 9-10 years.
All the stuff that we had promised is there and fully integrated.
Re: above post,
That is a definitive statement. If it transpires that all the stuff promised is not there and fully integrated, confidence will justifiably drop to zero.
This is precisely why IAF Chief was disappointed apart from only shown 5 ready when promised 11 (he did not care if they were not with engines - he said at least rest of the craft should be ready).Astra not fired in final config , dual pylon asraam not tested ...
HAL has set up a new production line in Nashik for Mk-1As to meet IAF’s growing needs. The firm says it can build 16 Mk-1As every year in Bengaluru, and the Nashik line will help it ramp up production to 24 jets.
HAL’s priorities and Country’s priorities are not in alignment anymore. HAL’s is to defend the money-flow to its top babus as salaries and pensions and easy life for their families. Job security is what Babus at HAL is defending right now. Rest of the matter have been left to the God.They want HAL to be the high paying MNAREGA for them.
I won't believe 16 a year coming out of Bengaluru until I see it. If HAL can do that, great. If they fall short, I think that the customer for Tejas Mk2 (IAF) should insist that GOI takes production of Mk2 away from HAL. IAF's job is to defend India, not to defend India as well or as badly as HAL allows.
View: https://x.com/rahulsinghx/status/1891719316678082571/photo/2
Key takeaways
1. 3 mk1a s are ready and flew with cat B engine
2. Astra firing tejas in 2 weeks
LCA and story of SQR change
The former IAF Chief, ACM V R Chaudhari (Retd) mentioned that two aspects of SQR were changed during LCA's lifetime. He briefly mentions about missile type change.
This is the story of missile type change -
- The outer-most pylon of LCA was designed to carry R-60 aka AA-8 missile without any weight margin for further missile upgrade.
- So, when the IAF said R-73 or AA-11 'Archer' will be standard missile, it led to wing root requiring strengthening because the pylon was not designed to carry this weight.
- Imagine the horror if LCA had gone live with ability to carry only AA-8 weight class missile on its outermost pylon?
- For reference, R-60 weighed 44 kgs while AA-11 weighs 105kg, Python weighs 103+ kg and AASRAM weighs 88kg.
- It would have never have been able to carry anything except R-60 and would have had to undergo modification after entering service!
In Kuntal's word...Mate its rendering
Could mean eitherPS A question about 'Indian English', please: does saying "It will arrive by 2030" mean "It will arrive before 2030" or does it mean "It will arrive before or during 2030."? For people using the vernacular used in England (eg me), it means "It will arrive before 2030".
Includes 2030.I find it difficult to keep up, given all the different reports emanating from India that quote 'informed anonymous sources'. What is the current date reported by an identified, credible source for delivery of the first F404-IN20?
Did I read somewhere that the first 2 engines are undergoing pre-delivery tests?
I ask because I am curious - along with many others - as to when IAF will receive its first Mk1A.
PS A question about 'Indian English', please: does saying "It will arrive by 2030" mean "It will arrive before 2030" or does it mean "It will arrive before or during 2030."? For people using the vernacular used in England (eg me), it means "It will arrive before 2030".