No clue how much of what you've written comes true but I prefer we degrade their war fighting machinery as well. Take down as many of their FAs & other flying assets as possible & then go in for the PN too. The damage must be such it takes them 2 decades to recover or given the state of their economy not at all.Okay, based on the whole atmosphere in the Indian defence apparatus and the government, the all-party meeting, HM briefing the President, the urgency with regards to IWT, cancelling the ceasefire agreement, the IAF exercise, the IN Vikrant carrier group in the Arabian Sea, Modi's remarks, I am going to try and predict impending events. @Mods, feel free to delete if it is inappropriate. And to give an objective measure of how much trust I have in my predictions, if I were a betting man, I'd accept 1 to 3 odds on them at best.
1. India escalates cross-border shelling with Pakistan and carries out Balakot-style air strikes, possibly coupled with Uri-style ground ops, but both in much larger strike packages. Only hits terrorist installations, initially avoiding engagement with the Pakistani military as much as possible.
2. While the offensive-defense style kinetic action is happening, India starts to block and divert the water flow. It has been established that, as of now, we lack long-term diversion and storage capabilities, but again, it isn't meant to be long-term anyway, and India has sufficient diversion and storage capacity at our disposal at the moment to significantly starve Pakistan of water for a couple of weeks.
3. Simultaneously, the INS Vikrant carrier group is also stationed close to but not in a blockade of Karachi. This is meant to act as a deterrent to any Pakistani misadventure and also allow for an instant blockade of Pakistan's lifeline in case of a full-fledged war.
4. Non-state actors in troubled regions of Pakistan take the opportunity to further put pressure on the Pakistani defence apparatus. India also holds the Taliban option to push Pakistan into a 2 front war if need arises.
After this, it's anyone's bet. Knowing Pakistan, starved of water, and having probably enough money to sustain war for a couple of weeks at max, the best it can do are some sorry ass scirmishes if Asim Munir chooses to be sensible. If not, it'll be an annihilation of Pakistan because no country in the world, not even China, will fund Pakistan's war effort. And let's be honest, Pakistan lacks the balls to go nuclear.
Therefore, Pakistan will either be forced to quietly witness the annihilation of part of its proxy apparatus and be dried out slowly and systematically over time, if it chooses to continue funding and rebuilding what will be left of the proxies, or face complete annihilation in a war with India in today's geopolitical climate.
The hell with clashes, we need an invasion across LoCClashes erupted between Indian Army & pak army in the Leepa valley sector of PoK
Okay, based on the whole atmosphere in the Indian defence apparatus and the government, the all-party meeting, HM briefing the President, the urgency with regards to IWT, cancelling the ceasefire agreement, the IAF exercise, the IN Vikrant carrier group in the Arabian Sea, Modi's remarks, I am going to try and predict impending events. @Mods, feel free to delete if it is inappropriate. And to give an objective measure of how much trust I have in my predictions, if I were a betting man, I'd accept 1 to 3 odds on them at best.
1. India escalates cross-border shelling with Pakistan and carries out Balakot-style air strikes, possibly coupled with Uri-style ground ops, but both in much larger strike packages. Only hits terrorist installations, initially avoiding engagement with the Pakistani military as much as possible.
2. While the offensive-defense style kinetic action is happening, India starts to block and divert the water flow. It has been established that, as of now, we lack long-term diversion and storage capabilities, but again, it isn't meant to be long-term anyway, and India has sufficient diversion and storage capacity at our disposal at the moment to significantly starve Pakistan of water for a couple of weeks.
3. Simultaneously, the INS Vikrant carrier group is also stationed close to but not in a blockade of Karachi. This is meant to act as a deterrent to any Pakistani misadventure and also allow for an instant blockade of Pakistan's lifeline in case of a full-fledged war.
4. Non-state actors in troubled regions of Pakistan take the opportunity to further put pressure on the Pakistani defence apparatus. India also holds the Taliban option to push Pakistan into a 2 front war if need arises.
After this, it's anyone's bet. Knowing Pakistan, starved of water, and having probably enough money to sustain war for a couple of weeks at max, the best it can do are some sorry ass scirmishes if Asim Munir chooses to be sensible. If not, it'll be an annihilation of Pakistan because no country in the world, not even China, will fund Pakistan's war effort. And let's be honest, Pakistan lacks the balls to go nuclear.
Therefore, Pakistan will either be forced to quietly witness the annihilation of part of its proxy apparatus and be dried out slowly and systematically over time, if it chooses to continue funding and rebuilding what will be left of the proxies, or face complete annihilation in a war with India in today's geopolitical climate.
What's the nature of the clashes? Arty duel?Clashes erupted between Indian Army & pak army in the Leepa valley sector of PoK
UN already calling for ‘maximum restraint’ and not let the situation ‘deteriorate further’
View: https://x.com/meghupdates/status/1915504611609501726?s=46
UN is essentially telling us to show restraint and get killed. But I refuse to show restraint in front of a terrorist—because if I do, I’ll be the one who dies. I’d rather take down the terrorist before he takes me down. It’s better to die fighting a war than to be a passive victim of a terrorist attack.Again with due respect and full protocol "maa chuda"
Indian opposition will do not such thing.. BSF jawan is a nobody..Indian oppositions won't let him be. He's clown enough to cross the border & be resting there. Not like he was fielded there for the first time. He should've known the implications
Also he did it the next day of the terrorist attack. When low IQ dehati should've been on high alert.Indian oppositions won't let him be. He's clown enough to cross the border & be resting there. Not like he was fielded there for the first time. He should've known the implications
Damn accurate I would say .... would be happy if this plays out but with disproportionate force & high casualties of pork civvies & armyOkay, based on the whole atmosphere in the Indian defence apparatus and the government, the all-party meeting, HM briefing the President, the urgency with regards to IWT, cancelling the ceasefire agreement, the IAF exercise, the IN Vikrant carrier group in the Arabian Sea, Modi's remarks, I am going to try and predict impending events. @Mods, feel free to delete if it is inappropriate. And to give an objective measure of how much trust I have in my predictions, if I were a betting man, I'd accept 1 to 3 odds on them at best.
1. India escalates cross-border shelling with Pakistan and carries out Balakot-style air strikes, possibly coupled with Uri-style ground ops, but both in much larger strike packages. Only hits terrorist installations, initially avoiding engagement with the Pakistani military as much as possible.
2. While the offensive-defense style kinetic action is happening, India starts to block and divert the water flow. It has been established that, as of now, we lack long-term diversion and storage capabilities, but again, it isn't meant to be long-term anyway, and India has sufficient diversion and storage capacity at our disposal at the moment to significantly starve Pakistan of water for a couple of weeks.
3. Simultaneously, the INS Vikrant carrier group is also stationed close to but not in a blockade of Karachi. This is meant to act as a deterrent to any Pakistani misadventure and also allow for an instant blockade of Pakistan's lifeline in case of a full-fledged war.
4. Non-state actors in troubled regions of Pakistan take the opportunity to further put pressure on the Pakistani defence apparatus. India also holds the Taliban option to push Pakistan into a 2 front war if need arises.
After this, it's anyone's bet. Knowing Pakistan, starved of water, and having probably enough money to sustain war for a couple of weeks at max, the best it can do are some sorry ass scirmishes if Asim Munir chooses to be sensible. If not, it'll be an annihilation of Pakistan because no country in the world, not even China, will fund Pakistan's war effort. And let's be honest, Pakistan lacks the balls to go nuclear.
Therefore, Pakistan will either be forced to quietly witness the annihilation of part of its proxy apparatus and be dried out slowly and systematically over time, if it chooses to continue funding and rebuilding what will be left of the proxies, or face complete annihilation in a war with India in today's geopolitical climate.
Does Indian political class has will to do this? Wipe out will come later. Let's first fire 50Pakistani Air Force and naval assets will be wiped out in first 10 days if war happens.
I am talking about this only. Start salami slicing inside POJ and POK. Start on full level. But move inside 15 km or something. Displace the local population further into Pakistan. Gain the area and critical heights.Another possibility...
No SF Raids, No precision bombing in Paki Mainland.
But...
Multiple Brigade sized ingress in Pok under Artillery & Air support... delivering sledgehammer blows to push back Mujahid force & Jaanbaaz force... holding land... altering LOC forever.
More than 100,000 people have been killed in terrorist attacks in India. So why should we think about casualties in war? I would rather die fighting a war with Pakistan than be a helpless victim of a terrorist attack. Any one of us could have been in Kashmir, killed by terrorists.