Pahalgam Islamic Terror Attack

Again with due respect and full protocol "maa chuda"
UN is essentially telling us to show restraint and get killed. But I refuse to show restraint in front of a terrorist—because if I do, I’ll be the one who dies. I’d rather take down the terrorist before he takes me down. It’s better to die fighting a war than to be a passive victim of a terrorist attack.
 
Indian oppositions won't let him be. He's clown enough to cross the border & be resting there. Not like he was fielded there for the first time. He should've known the implications
Indian opposition will do not such thing.. BSF jawan is a nobody..

Like with Abhinandan Pakistan wants to avoid a spanking by using him as pawn..
This might well have been a kidnap by Pakistan Army..
 
Indian oppositions won't let him be. He's clown enough to cross the border & be resting there. Not like he was fielded there for the first time. He should've known the implications
Also he did it the next day of the terrorist attack. When low IQ dehati should've been on high alert.
 
Okay, based on the whole atmosphere in the Indian defence apparatus and the government, the all-party meeting, HM briefing the President, the urgency with regards to IWT, cancelling the ceasefire agreement, the IAF exercise, the IN Vikrant carrier group in the Arabian Sea, Modi's remarks, I am going to try and predict impending events. @Mods, feel free to delete if it is inappropriate. And to give an objective measure of how much trust I have in my predictions, if I were a betting man, I'd accept 1 to 3 odds on them at best.

1. India escalates cross-border shelling with Pakistan and carries out Balakot-style air strikes, possibly coupled with Uri-style ground ops, but both in much larger strike packages. Only hits terrorist installations, initially avoiding engagement with the Pakistani military as much as possible.
2. While the offensive-defense style kinetic action is happening, India starts to block and divert the water flow. It has been established that, as of now, we lack long-term diversion and storage capabilities, but again, it isn't meant to be long-term anyway, and India has sufficient diversion and storage capacity at our disposal at the moment to significantly starve Pakistan of water for a couple of weeks.
3. Simultaneously, the INS Vikrant carrier group is also stationed close to but not in a blockade of Karachi. This is meant to act as a deterrent to any Pakistani misadventure and also allow for an instant blockade of Pakistan's lifeline in case of a full-fledged war.
4. Non-state actors in troubled regions of Pakistan take the opportunity to further put pressure on the Pakistani defence apparatus. India also holds the Taliban option to push Pakistan into a 2 front war if need arises.

After this, it's anyone's bet. Knowing Pakistan, starved of water, and having probably enough money to sustain war for a couple of weeks at max, the best it can do are some sorry ass scirmishes if Asim Munir chooses to be sensible. If not, it'll be an annihilation of Pakistan because no country in the world, not even China, will fund Pakistan's war effort. And let's be honest, Pakistan lacks the balls to go nuclear.

Therefore, Pakistan will either be forced to quietly witness the annihilation of part of its proxy apparatus and be dried out slowly and systematically over time, if it chooses to continue funding and rebuilding what will be left of the proxies, or face complete annihilation in a war with India in today's geopolitical climate.
Damn accurate I would say .... would be happy if this plays out but with disproportionate force & high casualties of pork civvies & army
 
Last edited:
Pakistani Air Force and naval assets will be wiped out in first 10 days if war happens.
Does Indian political class has will to do this? Wipe out will come later. Let's first fire 50 Brahmos from a stockpile of 2000+ on high value target.Since Galwan you have smoked atleast 20 Brahmos missile in name of testing.Still it's Kadi Ninda ++ for GoI.
 
To fight is not easy. War is not easy. But we must fight for what is right. These innocent people did not deserve to be shot for being Hindu. Is being Hindu a crime?

Not fighting against this is adharma and cowardliness of the worst condition.

Outcomes of the war is always uncertain or for that matter everything is uncertain. Bt we must do what is right.
 
Another possibility...

No SF Raids, No precision bombing in Paki Mainland.

But...

Multiple Brigade sized ingress in Pok under Artillery & Air support... delivering sledgehammer blows to push back Mujahid force & Jaanbaaz force... holding land... altering LOC forever.
I am talking about this only. Start salami slicing inside POJ and POK. Start on full level. But move inside 15 km or something. Displace the local population further into Pakistan. Gain the area and critical heights.


More than 100,000 people have been killed in terrorist attacks in India. So why should we think about casualties in war? I would rather die fighting a war with Pakistan than be a helpless victim of a terrorist attack. Any one of us could have been in Kashmir, killed by terrorists.


Road accidents in one year in India shocks you a lot. But social media is retarded.
 
Small arms firing at some places on the Line of Control were initiated by the Pakistan Army. Effectively responded to by the Indian Army. No casualties. Further details are being ascertained: Indian Army officials
 
Army chief Gen Upendra Dwivedi will leave for Srinagar and Udhampur shortly. He is scheduled to meet senior Army commanders deployed in the Kashmir valley along with officials of other security agencies. He will be reviewing the ongoing security situation in the valley and attempts by the Pakistan Army to violate the ceasefire along the Line of Control there: Defence officials
 
I am talking about this only. Start salami slicing inside POJ and POK. Start on full level. But move inside 15 km or something. Displace the local population further into Pakistan. Gain the area and critical heights.





Road accidents in one year in India shocks you a lot. But social media is retarded.
If we don’t fight this war, more people will continue to die. A war must be fought to put an end to these relentless terrorist attacks. In fact, war wouldn’t harm India as much as terrorism already has. This is a war—when civilians are being targeted and killed, it is a war. And it’s even worse than conventional war, because these terror attacks are causing more casualties and economic damage over time than many wars ever have.

Consider this: the total casualties in the 1971 war were under 2,000. Compare that to the thousands of lives lost and the massive financial toll inflicted by repeated terrorist strikes. How can India attract investment, become a $10 trillion economy, or eliminate poverty without ensuring national security? And what’s the point of achieving economic greatness if our people aren’t even safe?
 
I can survive a nuclear attack in underground bunkers—but not a terrorist firing at point-blank range. A nuclear war between India and Pakistan is impossible, because our military is always prepared to counter threats through conventional means, backed by advanced air defense systems. And even in the worst-case scenario, I’d rather die in a nuclear strike than be gunned down helplessly at close range by an Islamist terrorist.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top