- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Messages
- 265
- Likes
- 976
I like it when an English speaker quotes the Russian Constitution and decrees of the President of Russia to me. That's why he started the CTO, although there is a full-fledged war there. Wait for your elections and go vote, but here you are an ordinary observer and your "woof" will not change anything.This is what the Russian constitution actually says. I don't see the word obliged, or legally obliged, but perhaps you can show your evidence.
"The Russian Federation retains the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear weapons and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and/or its allies…” But that sentence ends with an unusual statement: “… and also in the case of aggression against the Russian Federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is put under threat”
See it's kind of weird and funny that in trading stock options it says "you have a right but not an obligation to buy or sell a stock or security ect. ect.) See Akim, once again you are distorting and/or just plain lying, but it's possible you're not doing it on purpose, it's more likely your just plain stupid. From what I see Putin has the right, but not the obligation to use nuclear weapons in such a circumstance.
Read the fine print: Russia's nuclear weapon use policy
In 2020, Putin signed a decree specifying conditions under which Russia would use nuclear weapons: 1) in response to a nuclear weapon attack and 2) in response to a conventional weapon attack if Russia’s existence is threatened. The first condition is unsurprising, but the second condition is...thebulletin.org
He didn't use nuclear weapons because he wasn't oblige to do so. You're illogic is funny. What do you mean he can only use nuclear weapons one time? The west isn't going to do anything if Putin uses nuclear weapons in his own country to defeat the invaders. Now if he uses them in Ukraine, that's another story. So instead of ducking my question, trying answering it? Also, he didn't need to use nuclear weapons, Russia kicked the shit out of Ukraine, and will soon see them running home with their tail tucked between their legs.I like it when an English speaker quotes the Russian Constitution and decrees of the President of Russia to me. That's why he started the CTO, although there is a full-fledged war there. Wait for your elections and go vote, but here you are an ordinary observer and your "woof" will not change anything.
That is, you are one of the supporters of "bombing Voronezh" or as Margarita Simonyan said "- Let's drop a nuclear bomb somewhere over Siberia and show that we have nuclear weapons"He didn't use nuclear weapons because he wasn't oblige to do so. You're illogic is funny. What do you mean he can only use nuclear weapons one time? The west isn't going to do anything if Putin uses nuclear weapons in his own country to defeat the invaders. Now if he uses them in Ukraine, that's another story. So instead of ducking my question, trying answering it? Also, he didn't need to use nuclear weapons, Russia kicked the shit out of Ukraine, and will soon see them running home with their tail tucked between their legs.
This is a video where a Ukrainian MiG shoots down a moped with the help of an R-73, which was supposed to target a weak internal combustion engine, the gunfire is even closer.
View: https://x.com/Voice1288291/status/1830001185149079750
I never heard of the bombing of Voronezh, so how the fuck can I support it? Also what specifically would that immediate response be? Harsh language from the west? Do you really think Ukraine is worth the west engaging in a nuclear war? They don't give a shit about your people, but the do care about money and exploiting your dumb asses. No way would they risk their own asses. I bet if Russia nuked Kiev, the west wouldn't do shit about it.That is, you are one of the supporters of "bombing Voronezh" or as Margarita Simonyan said "- Let's drop a nuclear bomb somewhere over Siberia and show that we have nuclear weapons"
Logic - minus level one hundred.
Nuclear weapons are effective in concentrating troops. Who told you that there is more than a company in one place?
Besides, radiation does not know about state borders. I have already said: He will be able to use it only once and an immediate response will follow. A person who is waiting for the elixir of immortality is ready for this - I think he is not ready.
He was not ready from the very beginning for our resistance - he thought that it would be like in Crimea. Now he is not ready to start a nuclear war.
It seems you are itching to take bath in nuclear fallout. Before the war you used to say similar things like let’s Putin invade us then you will teach him a lesson. Now you and Europe is crying as things not going accordingly.That is, you are one of the supporters of "bombing Voronezh" or as Margarita Simonyan said "- Let's drop a nuclear bomb somewhere over Siberia and show that we have nuclear weapons"
Logic - minus level one hundred.
Nuclear weapons are effective in concentrating troops. Who told you that there is more than a company in one place?
Besides, radiation does not know about state borders. I have already said: He will be able to use it only once and an immediate response will follow. A person who is waiting for the elixir of immortality is ready for this - I think he is not ready.
He was not ready from the very beginning for our resistance - he thought that it would be like in Crimea. Now he is not ready to start a nuclear war.
It all depends on the timing of what was said. There is a Soviet science fiction film "Planet of the Storms" (1962), which also shows dinosaurs on Venus.You like to make assumptions and connections without proof or evidence. It reminded me of what Carl Sagan wrote in his book cosmos.
The original observation was effectively a lack of an observation. The conclusion was dinosaurs.
This is breaking news and I haven't heard this from any other source yet, esp. the General staff of Ukraine, lol. My point is the credibility of my sources compared with yours. Lets wait and see if this turns out to be an accurate report.It all depends on the timing of what was said. There is a Soviet science fiction film "Planet of the Storms" (1962), which also shows dinosaurs on Venus.
View attachment 8930
It was later that everyone learned that the clouds of Venus are made of sulfuric acid.
As for the number of troops in the Kursk region, there is a detailed analysis of what units are there.
This is breaking news and I haven't heard this from any other source yet, esp. the General staff of Ukraine, lol. My point is the credibility of my sources compared with yours. Lets wait and see if this turns out to be an accurate report.
Russian Forces Recapture 100SQKM With Sudden Kursk Counter-Offensive
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3VyB_TdRIk
Gl0b0h0m0s Liberandu-sickulars and their analysis.
I think West should crash it's all fighter jets to scare Russia to its death.
Ukraine's fatal F-16 crash should scare Russia and China
Ukraine’s willingness to use – and lose – F-16s in combat strengthens the country’s defenses. The specific combat lessons from Ukraine will apply to future tactics.www.foxnews.com