Russian Ukrainian War

Estonia: “Estonia is ready to strike Russia first, if needed!”

meanwhile as par google, it's status-
View attachment 10851

Is it some kind of joke!!!!! or else a deliberate effort to drag Russia against NATO relating Article-5 with this scapegoats!

I guess a 100 KT nuke will be more than enough to make the whole country totally vanished if such scenario arises! No more Article-5 relatable if there is no more the country left to employ it, anymore.:fish::flypig:

Only Gl0b0h0m0s Liberandu-sickulars believes that America (NATO) will risk attack on Russia if Russia bombed NATO puppets.
 
Estonia: “Estonia is ready to strike Russia first, if needed!”

meanwhile as par google, it's status-
View attachment 10851

Is it some kind of joke!!!!! or else a deliberate effort to drag Russia against NATO relating Article-5 with this scapegoats!

I guess a 100 KT nuke will be more than enough to make the whole country totally vanished if such scenario arises! No more Article-5 relatable if there is no more the country left to employ it, anymore.:fish::flypig:
Exact representation of baltic chihuahuas.
IMG_20240919_233631_640.jpg
 
A threat, because of that America is not allowing Ukraine to use it's weapons deep in Russia.
It's a matter of time. You just didn't follow the discussions in May about using American weapons on Russian territory. We had to sacrifice Vovchansk for that. But now all the bridges in Kursk Oblast have been destroyed by American bombs because they are within the 100 km permitted radius. In May, ours couldn't even fire a Javelin at a Russian tank if it was on Russian territory.
 
It's a matter of time. You just didn't follow the discussions in May about using American weapons on Russian territory. We had to sacrifice Vovchansk for that. But now all the bridges in Kursk Oblast have been destroyed by American bombs because they are within the 100 km permitted radius. In May, ours couldn't even fire a Javelin at a Russian tank if it was on Russian territory.

You have habit of keep talking without knowing anything.

It's not you for which America is worried. America and Russia are big powers they have assets every where in on the planet. Russia have many options to provide big weapons to opponents of America. Cuba, Iran, Serbia, African nations, Hauthis.

Russia not going to use Nuke because you dumb just strike Moscow with Drones. Poland don't shoot Russian missiles even in its own territory.

For your information, Ukraine is using everything western in Kursk. Tank, Artillery, rockets.
 
You have habit of keep talking without knowing anything.

It's not you for which America is worried. America and Russia are big powers they have assets every where in on the planet. Russia have many options to provide big weapons to opponents of America. Cuba, Iran, Serbia, African nations, Hauthis.

Russia not going to use Nuke because you dumb just strike Moscow with Drones. Poland don't shoot Russian missiles even in its own territory.

For your information, Ukraine is using everything western in Kursk. Tank, Artillery, rockets.
I repeat: In order to use Western weapons in the Kursk region, we allowed the invasion of Vovchansk. Our intelligence saw the accumulation of Russian forces on the border in the Belgorod region, but we had too few of our own weapons to attack first. There were 12 BTGs in the Kursk region to attack the Sumy region, but we already had permission. The result is 1,200 sq. km of Russian territory.
This is what Estonia wants to do if it sees that the Russians are accumulating forces for an attack. Let Russian villages burn better than Estonian farmsteads.
Nuclear weapons are the road to hell for all sides. Putler will of course go to hell, but for now he wants to live. Therefore, Moscow is still far away and he can ignore this problem.
 
I repeat: In order to use Western weapons in the Kursk region, we allowed the invasion of Vovchansk. Our intelligence saw the accumulation of Russian forces on the border in the Belgorod region, but we had too few of our own weapons to attack first. There were 12 BTGs in the Kursk region to attack the Sumy region, but we already had permission. The result is 1,200 sq. km of Russian territory.

You are saying you have permission to use Western weapons but big NATO players is saying you don't have permission.

In reality, Your Kursk offence has stalled due to lack of permission to use Western weapons in Kursk.

So Say clearly whether you have permission or don't?

There were 12 BTGs in the Kursk region to attack the Sumy region,
Instead of strengthening your position, you attacked middle of concentrated troops?? Isn't it funny tactics??
But in reality there was only Russian border guard. Chechen TikTokers came much later.

Don't you think Zelensky attacked Kursk to gain some bargaining chip on negotiation table?? While leaving Donbas poorly defendable.

This is what Estonia wants to do if it sees that the Russians are accumulating forces for an attack. Let Russian villages burn better than Estonian farmsteads.
Leave Estonia I wouldn't comment :roflb: :roflb::roflb:
Seems They aren't stupid
 
Estonia: “Estonia is ready to strike Russia first, if needed!”

meanwhile as par google, it's status-
View attachment 10851

Is it some kind of joke!!!!! or else a deliberate effort to drag Russia against NATO relating Article-5 with this scapegoats!

I guess a 100 KT nuke will be more than enough to make the whole country totally vanished if such scenario arises! No more Article-5 relatable if there is no more the country left to employ it, anymore.:fish::flypig:

Article 5 is only defensive, e.g if Putin's appetite increases and he decides to make Estonia a part of Akhand Roos.
It is not offensive, if Estonia ko pagal kutta kat leta hai and it decides to attack Roos, roos will promptly anschluss it and Eurocucks will have their dicks in their hand.
 
Only Gl0b0h0m0s Liberandu-sickulars believes that America (NATO) will risk attack on Russia if Russia bombed NATO puppets.

Roosi doesn't want to test whether they will respond to Article 5 call over him grabbing some Baltic meme country.

NATO also doesn't want to risk doing ungli to Roosi via Polund or Baltics directly since Putin waves his nuclear danda every 5 secs.

This is basically one large dog barking at another pack of dogs led by a large dog from the opposite sides of the road.
 
Roosi doesn't want to test whether they will respond to Article 5 call over him grabbing some Baltic meme country.

NATO also doesn't want to risk doing ungli to Roosi via Polund or Baltics directly since Putin waves his nuclear danda every 5 secs.

This is basically one large dog barking at another pack of dogs led by a large dog from the opposite sides of the road.

True.
Infact Russia has been making everything clear from day one so they can avoid NATO involvement.

Only Ukraine wanted to be "Swarglok ka Raja"
 
You are saying you have permission to use Western weapons but big NATO players is saying you don't have permission.

In reality, Your Kursk offence has stalled due to lack of permission to use Western weapons in Kursk.

So Say clearly whether you have permission or don't?


Instead of strengthening your position, you attacked middle of concentrated troops?? Isn't it funny tactics??
But in reality there was only Russian border guard. Chechen TikTokers came much later.

Don't you think Zelensky attacked Kursk to gain some bargaining chip on negotiation table?? While leaving Donbas poorly defendable.


Leave Estonia I wouldn't comment :roflb: :roflb::roflb:
Seems They aren't stupid

So you don't follow the events and argue for the sake of arguing?
We have permission, but up to 100 km. We ask to increase the distance and it is not there yet.
Buy yourself a map and look - the Sumy region is Ukraine and so that the Russians do not create a bridgehead there, our troops created one in the Kursk region.
You constantly repeat what the Russians said. Right now too. Better think about where these 40 thousand Russian soldiers could be if they were now withdrawn from the front.
Do you think Putler has reserves? Today I listened to an interview with a Ukrainian officer who is fighting there against a marine brigade from the Pacific Ocean. He has already encountered them, but near Toretsk.

As for Estonia, there is talk that Finland and Estonia can strengthen control over the Gulf of Finland, through which Putler transports oil.
A third of the fleet is a "shadow fleet" that falls under the embargo.
It's simple. He doesn't risk keeping it in the Black Sea - we'll sink it right away.

By the way, have you seen the new round of confrontation at sea? We're launching kamikaze sea drones - the Russians came up with the idea of shooting them down with helicopter guns. Then we started installing R-73s on them and Russian helicopters were afraid to approach them. Now they've started using FPVs from helicopters to avoid getting into the range of our AD missiles. The next step is ours.
photo_2024-09-30_13-41-32.jpg
 
You are saying you have permission to use Western weapons but big NATO players is saying you don't have permission.

These nibbiars are kept on life support by their (((allies)))
There is a sea of delays before they get whatever they need.

I remember when the war started it was armored vehicles including tanks, everyone was foot dragging over this.
Then it was HIMARS type rocket artillery, once again foot dragging.
Then it was F16 took almost a year of back and forth
Now they are making Ukranis do mujra for long range mizziles to strike Russkie cities
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top