Small Arms and Weapons

Bravo one - the target is behind cover

Bravo two - No problem 😄

50 Cal got it
i remembered an old joke

(related to an incident in which an iowa class battleship was hit by korean 152mm shell (in korean war) and suffered minimal damage the captain however responded to that shell by a full salvo fire by the 16inch main guns on the hill)
captain : you see that hill
sailor : yes sir
captain : remove that hill
sailor : aye captain
 
Last edited:
it works buddy i think thats good otherwise army would be waiting for 3-4 years mars moon trials if officially hard kill system is sought after we also would be having many spare insas after the delivery of ak 203 too
My point was
First they went for 2 insas then 3 then 4 now direct 6
Then we will see 10 insas too
Lmao
 
it works buddy i think thats good otherwise army would be waiting for 3-4 years mars moon trials if officially hard kill system is sought after we also would be having many spare insas after the delivery of ak 203 too

every jugaad has potential value, nothing will go to waste. while higher end of spectrum with bells and whistles are desirable, lower end of spectrum of cheap and crude solutions have their value.

listing out a few famous ones

WW2 - sticky bombs (along with many others)
sri lankan civil war - suicide vests
murican invasion in iraq(second) - IED
nogorno-karabach war - drone warfare
russian invasion of ukraine - turtle tanks
 
it works buddy i think thats good otherwise army would be waiting for 3-4 years mars moon trials if officially hard kill system is sought after we also would be having many spare insas after the delivery of ak 203 too
It would work only in the initial assault period. Imagine you have to defend against a swarm of drones, how the hell are you going to reload this after your first volley?
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top