Chit Chat

If you are really a follower and believer in Sanatan Dharma then learn to identify the fake gods created and placed in our Temples. And do that when there is time. If we wait to do this for another 5-10 years then we will immortalize him and will see a dedicated section for him in each Hindu temple.

He no way made people follow Hindu customs rather his followers created a cult of their own and created a Sai version of each Hindu custom - aarti, bhajan and temples. You will find his Murtis in Hindu temples but never our Deities in any Sai temple.​
In 150 years we will probably find people worshipping in Ambedkar temples and more of them justifying it saying it is perfectly in keeping with Sanatan Dharma to do so because of some vague reference to something dharmic he may have done in his life or even just being a supposed anti-caste warrior.
 
Last edited:
Then you have not visited Bhakti Saints Temples and Ashrams of previous era. The Ashrams usually have no or single picture frame with Discussions on God and Guru primarily. No body forces "Idols" of anyone in temple. Its the temple management which decides what needs to be kept or with donors suggestions/wishes. But if any group comes and decides that dude you are not hindu/Sanatani because you have this particular image/guru in your temple - then I am sorry I shall oppose it as its plain analogous stupidity - talabanification.


Umm on the contrary - he did. You need to read more about him - better from the history. Do you know Bal Gangadhar Tilak use to meet him - when British had termed as extremist? Vasudevanand Saraswati ji Aka वासुदेवानंद सरस्वती / टेंबे स्वामी called Shirdi Sai Baba his brother - because both kept Dhuni discipline?
You also need to learn about Nath sampradaya especially in North west including Pakistan - where Shiva and Allah were considered same and were used interchangeably. He got hindu temples repaired. He was actually recognized by many other saints of that time like saint Anandanath of Yewala, Saint Bidkar Maharaj, Saint Gagangiri Maharaj, Saint Janakidas Maharaj and Sati Godavari Mataji etc.

Always read first earnestly from multiple sources - including biographies - before making decision. Worship Practices change with time.

Let temples decide what they want to keep or not. Let not outsiders force them what they should worship or not. But that does not mean I am green lighting so called Ajmer Chistis or others. no I am not.

View: https://www.youtube.com/live/pIRfsNfBWZM?si=qMCIsa7BFkhpSieP

I am disinclined to accept anything from Sai satcharitra as a source. Worship practises changing with time doesn't mean there are no rules or that anything goes, this sort of thing invites ridicule of Hindus for a reason.
 
If your routine requires you to carry laptop more frequently then go for M1.
3050 will only perform 3x when connected to wall.
Otherwise 3050 laptop will performance same as M1 but with huge weight, and lower battery life.
 
I am disinclined to accept anything from Sai satcharitra as a source. Worship practises changing with time doesn't mean there are no rules or that anything goes, this sort of thing invites ridicule of Hindus for a reason.
Roshan I also refrain from reading books and videos from newly minted followers or haters. Worship changes with time. Its just not limited to Sai but overall in any Hindu practice. Even "ridiculing hindus" are following modified worshipping methods than what their ancestors were doing including you. As I said bring historical source rather than random youtube or new books. Better bring excerpts which themselves have some historical source. Otherwise its lame merry go around debate without any conclusion.
 
In 150 years we will probably find people worshipping in Ambedkar temples and more of them justifying it saying it is perfectly in keeping with Sanatan Dharma to do so because of some vague reference to something dharmic he may have done in his life or even just being a supposed anti-caste warrior.
He's already considered a Boddhisattva by his followers. It's only a matter of time before the Buddha in a Navayana Chaitya disappears & the Baba photograph or icon NOW at the base of the Buddha icon replaces the latter .

It's a form of hero worship something the Greeks did , the Persians before the Greeks & us before both the Greeks & Persians. The Chinese have their own tradition of hero worship & for all their pretences of monotheism the Catholics worship their saints & Muslims their pirs & fakirs.
 

View: https://www.youtube.com/live/pIRfsNfBWZM?si=qMCIsa7BFkhpSieP

I am disinclined to accept anything from Sai satcharitra as a source. Worship practises changing with time doesn't mean there are no rules or that anything goes, this sort of thing invites ridicule of Hindus for a reason.

With respect to the video you've linked apart from unproven slander the anonymous guest who goes by the name Apostate Imam goes on to say he was directly responsible for killing Rani Laxmibai of Jhansi. I stopped viewing the video thereafter.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top