This is what happens when we do not own our own narrative & when we do have one it gets suppressed. This will continue as long as the dollar printing machine exists.
View attachment 13865
Gora Saheb Sheldon Poollock partly blames "Brahmin Elitism" for Britshit colonialism & GermsMany Nazism.
These people want to whitewash their white christian atrocities & shift blame elsewhere.
These well-wishers are also confused,because they are cultural aliens and instead of asserting their cultural confusions and their base understandings, we follow these dudes due to western institutionalism in academia, even in India.
First thing to understand about cultural takes, is that inorder to evaluate a foreign,alien culture, you need a frame of reference of YOUR culture that you can relate to, to understand.
When we here speak of 'gora dehaat', people instinctively think of some backwater region of UP/Bihar/Telengana etc. as 'ok. dehat, not apply to goras and see what its like' as a frame of reference.
What Pollock's deep aversion to satanan dharma is framed by, is the recent past and STILL present day phenomena of Nordic 'polytheism' and 'muh vikaangz ancestors and muh thor' worship deeply intersect with white superiority racism and Christianity being the 'non-racist civilizational force against evol racist pagans of aryanism'.
Since all these fuckers believe that goras brought hinduism/vedic culture via muh aryanism, they automatically think that to be a kattar hindu/hinduvta, you must be like the same as these Asatru or other pseudo-polytheistic-race-religionism' that is part of Euro-dehaat and Euro 'neo-enlightenment religions'.
And we must also be racist, because euros are racist and clearly, our religion comes from euros in urkonaziland. So our vedic ancestors were racist white dudes who made caste for race, just as their racist ancestors thought and their current day 'white polytheist' groups display the same racist mentality.
Westerners are deeply brainwashed away from one aspect of their past : thats its white people who invented the concept of race and race-based anything. Nobody else did, ever.
Westerners make bullshit copes with 'well you indians had concept of mleccha, sumerians described themselves as dark skinned blackheaded ones' but they forget, that racism isnt describing yourself in terms of colour/texture, racism is GROUPING people as similar **DUE** to same colour/feature, etc.
Its not racist to go 'hmm people in samoa are darker and flatter nosed than icelanders', racism enters the picture when its 'all flat nosed dark skinned people are closer to each other and all white skinned pointy nosed people are closer to one another, so treat these features differently. Non white cultures didnt have a concept of race, they had a concept of jaati and showed in-jaati elitism (which is all over the place in our species).
Take the Chinese, a non white 'race' that are accused of 'racism' and they clearly are the most 'racist' after white people. But historically, the Chinese were all 'muh superior han jaati and all u barbs are inferior' and had rungs to it - no Chinese historically ever- EVER- saw a turk or a mongol or a hun to be 'closer to me coz they look similar to me and closer to being muh people' than the 'round eyed hairy ugly barbarians of the west who lived in great cities of iran and india'.
This difference- the difference between racism and ethnocentrism- is often ignored completely in western academia and western academia has a huge blind spot for the western invention of race as a concept itself.
Its the Greco-Romans who first time in history start classifying 'white pypo', 'black pypo' and 'slanty eyed pypo' - they didnt use 'brown pypo' or have that concept at all, because the Greco-Romans saw we browns as mucho, mucho more preferable people and respectable than the pale naked terrors that lived in cold dank forests of europistan back then.
Which is why this 'brown pypo' things comes around 600-700 years ago, with hatred towards arabs solidifying and no more contact with rest of brown people land.
