Indian Air Force: News & Discussions

They don't have much to offer that we already haven't applied and improved.

Doctrinally, culturally and militarily, the VKS directly contrasts against the IAF, as a measure of how different they both are.

VKS is nothing more than an extension of their ground force, an airborne artillery if you will - all of their objectives, training methodologies, missions etc are slaved to their army, which prevents them from being an actually independent arm of the military. This means they don't plan their own complex air tasking orders(ATO), don't do preventive/planned suppression/destruction of enemy air defenses, don't hit out at crucial command/control/communication hubs in advance, and certainly do not plan large offensive/defensive counter air packages.

This is in sharp contrast to the IAF: example being all the previous wars the Indian military has faced - they have been given complete freedom to shape their own ATOs and decisively strike out against targets that will help the future needs of the war, instead of being slaved to the ground forces as airborne artillery against curent targets.

Leaving that difference aside, even the Soviet/Russian methodology of how fighter to fighter engagements(BVR, WVR, ..) play out is inferior to the IAF methodology. Simply put, the Russian culture/doctrine presumes that the ground controller/AWACS controller should have more control over the engagement than the actual pilot present there - this means that the decision to action loop(OODA loop) of the Russian pilots are far slower than their enemy, because the Russian pilots have to first have to ask, and then be directed.

The IAF system is based on the Western method: the pilot is in ultimate control of the aircraft. The GCI/AWACS are not overlords over the pilot. This means that the OODA loop is shorter and faster than their enemy, which gives them an edge.

I've embedded two videos down below, the first one is the Soviet/Russian system, and the second one is the IAF system. Let me know which one you consider to be the cleanest and most effective:

Iranian pilot, with GCI, shoots down Iraqi Mirages. FC = Fighter Control(GCI)


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxJITRbulnc


4 American F-15Cs against 3 Iraqi MiG-23s


View: https://youtu.be/xsbFBHxUCAw?t=35

What you write is true and accurate for the Soviet Air Force, the RuAF is a hollowed out defunct organisation that is sabotaging its own pilots and personnel thanks to corruption, regular kremlin purges, and genuinely unmaintained equipment.
 
A good video of IAF's S/w Development Institute. It showcases Su-30MKI, LCA, MiG-29, turboprop trainer, AWACS.
AVM K N Santosh, the commander of S/w dev. institute, said that MLU is supposed to happen every 10 years. He believes in achieving 100% self-relliance.
Hats off :yo:to my fellow computer/electronics guys👨‍💻👩‍💻. I wish if i was good enough scorer :eric:to get into such priviledged place.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-z-YSi9zyg
 
A good video of IAF's S/w Development Institute. It showcases Su-30MKI, LCA, MiG-29, turboprop trainer, AWACS.
AVM K N Santosh, the commander of S/w dev. institute, said that MLU is supposed to happen every 10 years. He believes in achieving 100% self-relliance.
Hats off :yo:to my fellow computer/electronics guys👨‍💻👩‍💻. I wish if i was good enough scorer :eric:to get into such priviledged place.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-z-YSi9zyg

Damn SDR devloped by DPSU was quoted 290 crores for LCA and SDI provided it for 0 cost 😳 SDI is doing all weapon integration like ASTrA Gaurav
 
Last edited:
It looks like Jaguar planes of IAF will continue to be operational for long time.

Hanging onto Jaguars seems like a good idea if the alternative is having nothing until Tejas Mk2 turns up.
 
How did you conclude that it's the engines? Care to be objective much?
Do you ever come to know about any cause for any crash since independence?? All you hear “A technical snag” even if you switch off engine in midair.

We don’t follow logic in few particular threads. This is a unwritten rule of DFB that any crash should be attributed to Engine/Flight control ( if it is Russian) or Babus/PSUs ( If it is Western or Indian)

In the end you to write “Jai General” otherwise master ji will ban you.
 
Problem is also with IAF's IQ. They push Russian machines, managed by Desi crew to the western limits. They think it's cool.
Last time M2K and Su-30 crashed mid air into each other. I fail to understand under which circumstances these jets will have to be so close to their enemies. Looks like BVR concept still needs to make a way inside their brain.

I think this is a very misinformed post for several reasons:

- "Russian machines. managed by Desi crew, to the Western limits" what does this mean? The airframes that the IAF uses are operated within their specified limits. Whether the plane is pulling 8Gs or 20+ degrees of AoA is all dependent on the fact whether the machine can do that or not. Regarding the maintenance: I don't think they are doing anything wrong, otherwise we would have seen a lot more crashes(example: The RuAF). What does "western limit" even mean?

- The M2K and Su-30 were flying at TACDE, which is a premier institute meant to develop new tactics and validate old ones. Part of that includes doing DACT(dissimilar aircraft combat training) in which planes with different characteristics are put against each other to simulate an enemy.

- "Looks like BVR concept still needs to make a way inside their brain" If you are able to think that BVR is important in this day and age, then why wouldn't the air force? Why else are they rushing to replace all of their old R77s with the Astra series of BVRAAMs?
 
As we know IAF inventory is both technology intensive as well as capital intensive, unlike IA they can't buy piece meal basis. by it's nature, IAF has to be constantly on their toes because of constant advances in tech by our adversaries as well as around the world.

even when IAF, Govt, Vendor are on same page, it takes about a decade for order to get signed for the bigger deals.

wanted to build this time line for some time, here is the first cut. there are missing items like dhruv, jaguar upgrade etc. incase anyone wants to contribute on filling in the details or any corrections, feel free to do so by copying the table and adding details.

Idea is to capture important milestones like order given, delivery commencement, Induction delivery complete. and also IAF's other projects like upgrades, MAFI and ALGs. since major chuck of their capex budget goes for these milestones and projects.

YearSystemQuantityCostRemarks
1996SU-30MKI50
2000SU-30MKI140
2002IL-78 MKI6Air refuelling
2004BAE Hawk66
2007SU-30MKI40
2008BAE Hawk40
2008Akash SAM2 SquadronsOrder given
2009SPYDER SAM18 SquadronsOrder Given
2009MR-SAMContract signed but project delay by 4 years
2010C-1710
2010Akash SAM6 SquadronsOrder Given
2011MAFI PHASE 130 airfields36000 Cr.completed in 2020
Modernisation of Airfields Infrastructure
2011MIG-29 UPG69
2012Pilatus PC-7 Mk375
2012SU-30MKI42
2012Akash SAMDelivery begins
2012SPYDER SAMDelivery completed
2013C-130J12
2015CH-47 Chinook15
2015AH-64E Apache22
2015Akash SAMInduction
2016Rafale3659000 Cr.Contract signed
2018SU-30MKIFirst domestic overhaul of existing inventory
2018S-4005 Squadrons35000 Cr.
2019RafaleFirst delivery
2020MAFI PHASE 2
2021C-2955621935 Cr.Order
2021LCA-MK1A8348000 Cr.
2021SU-30MKILast of 222 order delivered
2021MR-SAM18 Squadrons8396 Cr.Induction starts
2021S-400First Delivery
2022RafaleDelivery completes
2022HTT-40 Trainer706800 Cr.Order
2022S-400Second Delivery
2023S-400Third Delivery
YearSystemQuantityCostRemarks
1996SU-30MKI50
2000SU-30MKI140
2002IL-78 MKI6Air refuelling
2004BAE Hawk66
2007SU-30MKI40
2008JAGUAR682400 Cr.DARIN 2 upgrade by HAL
2008BAE Hawk40
2008Akash SAM2 SquadronsOrder given
2009SPYDER SAM18 SquadronsOrder Given
2009MR-SAMContract signed but project delay by 4 years
2010C-1710
2010Akash SAM6 SquadronsOrder Given
2011MAFI PHASE 130 airfields36000 Cr.completed in 2020
Modernisation of Airfields Infrastructure
2011MIG-29 UPG69
2012Pilatus PC-7 Mk375
2012SU-30MKI42
2012Akash SAMDelivery begins
2012SPYDER SAMDelivery completed
2013C-130J12
2015CH-47 Chinook15
2015AH-64E Apache22
2015Akash SAMInduction
2016JAGUAR 3DARIN 3 IOC
2016Rafale3659000 Cr.Contract signed
2018SU-30MKIFirst domestic overhaul of existing inventory
2018S-4005 Squadrons35000 Cr.
2019RafaleFirst delivery
2020MAFI PHASE 2
2021C-2955621935 Cr.Order
2021LCA-MK1A8348000 Cr.
2021SU-30MKILast of 222 order delivered
2021MR-SAM18 Squadrons8396 Cr.Induction starts
2021S-400First Delivery
2022RafaleDelivery completes
2022HTT-40 Trainer706800 Cr.Order
2022S-400Second Delivery
2023S-400Third Delivery
2024AL-31FP engines24026000 Cr.Order given, delivery period spread across 8 years
 
Last edited:
YearSystemQuantityCostRemarks
1996SU-30MKI50
2000SU-30MKI140
2002IL-78 MKI6Air refuelling
2004BAE Hawk66
2007SU-30MKI40
2008JAGUAR682400 Cr.DARIN 2 upgrade by HAL
2008BAE Hawk40
2008Akash SAM2 SquadronsOrder given
2009SPYDER SAM18 SquadronsOrder Given
2009MR-SAMContract signed but project delay by 4 years
2010C-1710
2010Akash SAM6 SquadronsOrder Given
2011MAFI PHASE 130 airfields36000 Cr.completed in 2020
Modernisation of Airfields Infrastructure
2011MIG-29 UPG69
2012Pilatus PC-7 Mk375
2012SU-30MKI42
2012Akash SAMDelivery begins
2012SPYDER SAMDelivery completed
2013C-130J12
2015CH-47 Chinook15
2015AH-64E Apache22
2015Akash SAMInduction
2016JAGUAR3DARIN 3 IOC
2016Rafale3659000 Cr.Contract signed
2018SU-30MKIFirst domestic overhaul of existing inventory
2018S-4005 Squadrons35000 Cr.
2019RafaleFirst delivery
2020MAFI PHASE 2
2021C-2955621935 Cr.Order
2021LCA-MK1A8348000 Cr.
2021SU-30MKILast of 222 order delivered
2021MR-SAM18 Squadrons8396 Cr.Induction starts
2021S-400First Delivery
2022RafaleDelivery completes
2022HTT-40 Trainer706800 Cr.Order
2022S-400Second Delivery
2023S-400Third Delivery
2024AL-31FP engines24026000 Cr.Order given, delivery period spread across 8 years
SpyDer is either 3 squadrons or 9 squadrons.

MRSAM is also 9 squadrons. I know the reference for 18 squadrons will be the slide shown by IAF chief last year.

You can also include 244 CIWS guns, Phalcon AWACS and Netra MK-1 AEW&C.
 
Last edited:
SpyDer is either 3 squadrons or 9 squadrons.

MRSAM is also 9 squadrons. I know the reference for 18 squadrons will be the slide shown by IAF chief last year.

You can also include 244 CIWS guns, Phalcon AWACS and Netra MK-1 AEW&C.

copy the table, and add the details in year wise sequence.
 
I deleted that before you even sent a reply, because I thought I was being harsh, not because I was wrong or misinformed.
I think this is a very misinformed post for several reasons:

- "Russian machines. managed by Desi crew, to the Western limits" what does this mean? The airframes that the IAF uses are operated within their specified limits. Whether the plane is pulling 8Gs or 20+ degrees of AoA is all dependent on the fact whether the machine can do that or not. Regarding the maintenance: I don't think they are doing anything wrong, otherwise we would have seen a lot more crashes(example: The RuAF). What does "western limit" even mean?
What Machine "can do" can be overridden. I thought you would know that. I've had previously came across articles and interviews stating that Mig21 pilots used to override many limitations put into system/MC. Same was said about mig29.
You can read in below article on DFI.
- The M2K and Su-30 were flying at TACDE, which is a premier institute meant to develop new tactics and validate old ones. Part of that includes doing DACT(dissimilar aircraft combat training) in which planes with different characteristics are put against each other to simulate an enemy.
And ? Even in real combat chances of head on collision might be very small. I always believe that if their combat involves such tactics that means they are heavily preparing for losing EW battle. Which kind of makes sense looking at the pending procurement offensive and defensive AEWC platforms.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

VPN-HSL-250-X250
Back
Top