- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Messages
- 169
- Likes
- 346
Some still would lmaosome members used to hurl abuses at me for saying the same thing in 2022.
Some still would lmaosome members used to hurl abuses at me for saying the same thing in 2022.
Because Russia barely has any planes left to fend off Ukraine.Why don't we do air exercises with Russian Airforce?
They don't have much to offer that we already haven't applied and improved.
Doctrinally, culturally and militarily, the VKS directly contrasts against the IAF, as a measure of how different they both are.
VKS is nothing more than an extension of their ground force, an airborne artillery if you will - all of their objectives, training methodologies, missions etc are slaved to their army, which prevents them from being an actually independent arm of the military. This means they don't plan their own complex air tasking orders(ATO), don't do preventive/planned suppression/destruction of enemy air defenses, don't hit out at crucial command/control/communication hubs in advance, and certainly do not plan large offensive/defensive counter air packages.
This is in sharp contrast to the IAF: example being all the previous wars the Indian military has faced - they have been given complete freedom to shape their own ATOs and decisively strike out against targets that will help the future needs of the war, instead of being slaved to the ground forces as airborne artillery against curent targets.
Leaving that difference aside, even the Soviet/Russian methodology of how fighter to fighter engagements(BVR, WVR, ..) play out is inferior to the IAF methodology. Simply put, the Russian culture/doctrine presumes that the ground controller/AWACS controller should have more control over the engagement than the actual pilot present there - this means that the decision to action loop(OODA loop) of the Russian pilots are far slower than their enemy, because the Russian pilots have to first have to ask, and then be directed.
The IAF system is based on the Western method: the pilot is in ultimate control of the aircraft. The GCI/AWACS are not overlords over the pilot. This means that the OODA loop is shorter and faster than their enemy, which gives them an edge.
I've embedded two videos down below, the first one is the Soviet/Russian system, and the second one is the IAF system. Let me know which one you consider to be the cleanest and most effective:
Iranian pilot, with GCI, shoots down Iraqi Mirages. FC = Fighter Control(GCI)
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxJITRbulnc
4 American F-15Cs against 3 Iraqi MiG-23s
View: https://youtu.be/xsbFBHxUCAw?t=35
What you write is true and accurate for the Soviet Air Force, the RuAF is a hollowed out defunct organisation that is sabotaging its own pilots and personnel thanks to corruption, regular kremlin purges, and genuinely unmaintained equipment.
A good video of IAF's S/w Development Institute. It showcases Su-30MKI, LCA, MiG-29, turboprop trainer, AWACS.
AVM K N Santosh, the commander of S/w dev. institute, said that MLU is supposed to happen every 10 years. He believes in achieving 100% self-relliance.
Hats off to my fellow computer/electronics guys. I wish if i was good enough scorer to get into such priviledged place.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-z-YSi9zyg
Hanging onto Jaguars seems like a good idea if the alternative is having nothing until Tejas Mk2 turns up.It looks like Jaguar planes of IAF will continue to be operational for long time.
IAF Jaguars – "Aging Like A Fine Wine," Why Retiring Nuke-Capable Combat Jets Is Not A Great Move?
With Modified Headlines The Indian Air Force (IAF) reportedly plans to begin phasing out its Jaguar strike aircraft starting in 2027-2028, with the complete phase-out scheduled by 2035-2040. Considering the relentless depletion of the IAF’s fighter inventory—due to delays in planned...www.eurasiantimes.com
Appraisal sounds like Office Annual Appraisal discussion with manager Salary hike? Band progression?
Mig 29 is pretty good and we have not lost them like the 21s.. fighter flying will have such accidents.. so let's not lose our mindsJust how many of these flying pieces of **** have we lost to accidents?
Do you ever come to know about any cause for any crash since independence?? All you hear “A technical snag” even if you switch off engine in midair.How did you conclude that it's the engines? Care to be objective much?
Problem is also with IAF's IQ. They push Russian machines, managed by Desi crew to the western limits. They think it's cool.
Last time M2K and Su-30 crashed mid air into each other. I fail to understand under which circumstances these jets will have to be so close to their enemies. Looks like BVR concept still needs to make a way inside their brain.
As we know IAF inventory is both technology intensive as well as capital intensive, unlike IA they can't buy piece meal basis. by it's nature, IAF has to be constantly on their toes because of constant advances in tech by our adversaries as well as around the world.
even when IAF, Govt, Vendor are on same page, it takes about a decade for order to get signed for the bigger deals.
wanted to build this time line for some time, here is the first cut. there are missing items like dhruv, jaguar upgrade etc. incase anyone wants to contribute on filling in the details or any corrections, feel free to do so by copying the table and adding details.
Idea is to capture important milestones like order given, delivery commencement, Induction delivery complete. and also IAF's other projects like upgrades, MAFI and ALGs. since major chuck of their capex budget goes for these milestones and projects.
Year System Quantity Cost Remarks 1996 SU-30MKI 50 2000 SU-30MKI 140 2002 IL-78 MKI 6 Air refuelling 2004 BAE Hawk 66 2007 SU-30MKI 40 2008 BAE Hawk 40 2008 Akash SAM 2 Squadrons Order given 2009 SPYDER SAM 18 Squadrons Order Given 2009 MR-SAM Contract signed but project delay by 4 years 2010 C-17 10 2010 Akash SAM 6 Squadrons Order Given 2011 MAFI PHASE 1 30 airfields 36000 Cr. completed in 2020
Modernisation of Airfields Infrastructure2011 MIG-29 UPG 69 2012 Pilatus PC-7 Mk3 75 2012 SU-30MKI 42 2012 Akash SAM Delivery begins 2012 SPYDER SAM Delivery completed 2013 C-130J 12 2015 CH-47 Chinook 15 2015 AH-64E Apache 22 2015 Akash SAM Induction 2016 Rafale 36 59000 Cr. Contract signed 2018 SU-30MKI First domestic overhaul of existing inventory 2018 S-400 5 Squadrons 35000 Cr. 2019 Rafale First delivery 2020 MAFI PHASE 2 2021 C-295 56 21935 Cr. Order 2021 LCA-MK1A 83 48000 Cr. 2021 SU-30MKI Last of 222 order delivered 2021 MR-SAM 18 Squadrons 8396 Cr. Induction starts 2021 S-400 First Delivery 2022 Rafale Delivery completes 2022 HTT-40 Trainer 70 6800 Cr. Order 2022 S-400 Second Delivery 2023 S-400 Third Delivery
Year | System | Quantity | Cost | Remarks |
1996 | SU-30MKI | 50 | ||
2000 | SU-30MKI | 140 | ||
2002 | IL-78 MKI | 6 | Air refuelling | |
2004 | BAE Hawk | 66 | ||
2007 | SU-30MKI | 40 | ||
2008 | JAGUAR | 68 | 2400 Cr. | DARIN 2 upgrade by HAL |
2008 | BAE Hawk | 40 | ||
2008 | Akash SAM | 2 Squadrons | Order given | |
2009 | SPYDER SAM | 18 Squadrons | Order Given | |
2009 | MR-SAM | Contract signed but project delay by 4 years | ||
2010 | C-17 | 10 | ||
2010 | Akash SAM | 6 Squadrons | Order Given | |
2011 | MAFI PHASE 1 | 30 airfields | 36000 Cr. | completed in 2020 Modernisation of Airfields Infrastructure |
2011 | MIG-29 UPG | 69 | ||
2012 | Pilatus PC-7 Mk3 | 75 | ||
2012 | SU-30MKI | 42 | ||
2012 | Akash SAM | Delivery begins | ||
2012 | SPYDER SAM | Delivery completed | ||
2013 | C-130J | 12 | ||
2015 | CH-47 Chinook | 15 | ||
2015 | AH-64E Apache | 22 | ||
2015 | Akash SAM | Induction | ||
2016 | JAGUAR | 3 | DARIN 3 IOC | |
2016 | Rafale | 36 | 59000 Cr. | Contract signed |
2018 | SU-30MKI | First domestic overhaul of existing inventory | ||
2018 | S-400 | 5 Squadrons | 35000 Cr. | |
2019 | Rafale | First delivery | ||
2020 | MAFI PHASE 2 | |||
2021 | C-295 | 56 | 21935 Cr. | Order |
2021 | LCA-MK1A | 83 | 48000 Cr. | |
2021 | SU-30MKI | Last of 222 order delivered | ||
2021 | MR-SAM | 18 Squadrons | 8396 Cr. | Induction starts |
2021 | S-400 | First Delivery | ||
2022 | Rafale | Delivery completes | ||
2022 | HTT-40 Trainer | 70 | 6800 Cr. | Order |
2022 | S-400 | Second Delivery | ||
2023 | S-400 | Third Delivery | ||
2024 | AL-31FP engines | 240 | 26000 Cr. | Order given, delivery period spread across 8 years |
SpyDer is either 3 squadrons or 9 squadrons.
Year System Quantity Cost Remarks 1996 SU-30MKI 50 2000 SU-30MKI 140 2002 IL-78 MKI 6 Air refuelling 2004 BAE Hawk 66 2007 SU-30MKI 40 2008 JAGUAR 68 2400 Cr. DARIN 2 upgrade by HAL 2008 BAE Hawk 40 2008 Akash SAM 2 Squadrons Order given 2009 SPYDER SAM 18 Squadrons Order Given 2009 MR-SAM Contract signed but project delay by 4 years 2010 C-17 10 2010 Akash SAM 6 Squadrons Order Given 2011 MAFI PHASE 1 30 airfields 36000 Cr. completed in 2020
Modernisation of Airfields Infrastructure2011 MIG-29 UPG 69 2012 Pilatus PC-7 Mk3 75 2012 SU-30MKI 42 2012 Akash SAM Delivery begins 2012 SPYDER SAM Delivery completed 2013 C-130J 12 2015 CH-47 Chinook 15 2015 AH-64E Apache 22 2015 Akash SAM Induction 2016 JAGUAR 3 DARIN 3 IOC 2016 Rafale 36 59000 Cr. Contract signed 2018 SU-30MKI First domestic overhaul of existing inventory 2018 S-400 5 Squadrons 35000 Cr. 2019 Rafale First delivery 2020 MAFI PHASE 2 2021 C-295 56 21935 Cr. Order 2021 LCA-MK1A 83 48000 Cr. 2021 SU-30MKI Last of 222 order delivered 2021 MR-SAM 18 Squadrons 8396 Cr. Induction starts 2021 S-400 First Delivery 2022 Rafale Delivery completes 2022 HTT-40 Trainer 70 6800 Cr. Order 2022 S-400 Second Delivery 2023 S-400 Third Delivery 2024 AL-31FP engines 240 26000 Cr. Order given, delivery period spread across 8 years
SpyDer is either 3 squadrons or 9 squadrons.
MRSAM is also 9 squadrons. I know the reference for 18 squadrons will be the slide shown by IAF chief last year.
You can also include 244 CIWS guns, Phalcon AWACS and Netra MK-1 AEW&C.
I think this is a very misinformed post for several reasons:
What Machine "can do" can be overridden. I thought you would know that. I've had previously came across articles and interviews stating that Mig21 pilots used to override many limitations put into system/MC. Same was said about mig29.- "Russian machines. managed by Desi crew, to the Western limits" what does this mean? The airframes that the IAF uses are operated within their specified limits. Whether the plane is pulling 8Gs or 20+ degrees of AoA is all dependent on the fact whether the machine can do that or not. Regarding the maintenance: I don't think they are doing anything wrong, otherwise we would have seen a lot more crashes(example: The RuAF). What does "western limit" even mean?
And ? Even in real combat chances of head on collision might be very small. I always believe that if their combat involves such tactics that means they are heavily preparing for losing EW battle. Which kind of makes sense looking at the pending procurement offensive and defensive AEWC platforms.- The M2K and Su-30 were flying at TACDE, which is a premier institute meant to develop new tactics and validate old ones. Part of that includes doing DACT(dissimilar aircraft combat training) in which planes with different characteristics are put against each other to simulate an enemy.