Indian Air Force: News & Discussions

Su 57 jets have shot down Ukrainian Su 27 & F16 from >150 kms away & without even triggering RWR/MAWS . Whatever tech they've is more than capable of taking down any Porki/Chinese jets. US is too unreliable to depend upon & we should never buy any fighter jets from them 😔.
Which missile they used? Is it even possible to shoot down a jet from 150km?
 
Su 57 jets have shot down Ukrainian Su 27 & F16 from >150 kms away & without even triggering RWR/MAWS . Whatever tech they've is more than capable of taking down any Porki/Chinese jets. US is too unreliable to depend upon & we should never buy any fighter jets from them 😔.

This is some serious Tom Cruise kind of $hit!! Any sources to verify this?
 
Might not be perfect stealth jet but still it's the best replacement for su30mki.
Relying solely on murrica for our local fighter jet program was a mistake, we must diversify our aquisition of fighter jet to keep our airforce running.
BS ….. The SU-30Mki is not due for replacement for another 20 to 30 years. It is highly upgraded in next three years.
 
you know what... its about time people started questioning indian airforce too.. keeping aside their jai ho invincible and perfect faultless indian military attitude.. if 50% blame goes to genrols and import lobbies then rest of 50% also goes to their training, maintainence, handling, protocols etc of IAF.. its probably the most crashed airforce too keeping in mind the ratio of their jets to crashes
View: https://x.com/gngziy2ldhfgg/status/1884717756626403486
 
you know what... its about time people started questioning indian airforce too.. keeping aside their jai ho invincible and perfect faultless indian military attitude.. if 50% blame goes to genrols and import lobbies then rest of 50% also goes to their training, maintainence, handling, protocols etc of IAF.. its probably the most crashed airforce too keeping in mind the ratio of their jets to crashes
View: https://x.com/gngziy2ldhfgg/status/1884717756626403486

We do that all the time.
 
you know what... its about time people started questioning indian airforce too.. keeping aside their jai ho invincible and perfect faultless indian military attitude.. if 50% blame goes to genrols and import lobbies then rest of 50% also goes to their training, maintainence, handling, protocols etc of IAF.. its probably the most crashed airforce too keeping in mind the ratio of their jets to crashes
View: https://x.com/gngziy2ldhfgg/status/1884717756626403486


All 3 forces seem to have a lax attitude towards maintenance and safety, although it is mainly crashing jets and ships falling in dry dock and boat-collisions that grab headlines.

Anyway don't take Ching and Paki seriously, they can cover-up their crashes.
Even US fighters crash like the recent F-35 and we have Roosi maal which is abused far beyond it's expiry date so it's expected
 
With AMCA prospectively not reaching FOC until some time in the 2040's, India is contemplating buying Su-57. This article suggests that Su-57 has a long way to go before it, too, will be fully developed. In view of what it says, should India be thinking of buying the Su-57?

 
I see an opportunity here for India to get a bargain. However, opportunities for getting a bargain need to be taken when they are there. Sadly, not something India is set up to do.

 
maybe already posted . source for that twitter post by wlvn

translation

"French pilots [on Rafale] regularly facing fifth-generation fighters [like the American F35] in inter-allied exercises note that the combat mission against stealth fighters is impossible to win with the current state of the sensors." Result: "In the event of engagement alongside its Western allies in a high-intensity conflict, the French fighter could be confined to the role of supporting fifth-generation fighters."


View: https://x.com/jdomerchet/status/1884231471407198384

article is behind paywall , but found another article


And to clarify: "French pilots regularly facing 5th generation fighters in inter-allied exercises note that 'the combat mission against stealth fighters on Rafale is impossible to win with the current state of the sensors."

While "radar stealth is certainly not enough to achieve air superiority," it is nevertheless an "undeniable asset, particularly in the toughest scenarios, unless low-altitude penetration missions are accepted, with a high level of risk," the authors of this study emphasize. In addition, they continue, "it could also become an entry ticket for front-line missions, and therefore a marker of influence for a coalition's strategic options."

Under these conditions, they warn, French fighter aircraft "could be confined to the role of 'supplementary'" in a "two-speed air coalition, in which 4th generation fighters will have their place." General Lanata had said nothing else almost eight years ago.

That being said, this "sensors" business is intriguing. If an aircraft like the F-35 can be "invisible" to certain means of detection [this is a priori not the case for passive radars and it depends on the frequency bands used], its infrared signature - with its F-135 engine - can betray it. The IR channel of the Optronic Front Sector [OSF] of the Rafale would be able to detect it face to face, subject, however, to weather conditions.

Incidentally, the Rafale will soon be equipped with an improved OSF, the General Directorate of Armaments having recently conducted tests on a new optic on the infrared channel of the OSF, this being supposed to improve the "image quality of the Night Identification function".
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top