- Joined
- Jul 1, 2024
- Messages
- 677
- Likes
- 2,689
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So it's now official: they are 40% of the state. Himanta is overly optimistic with his projections for 2041.
With the rebellious Kanglus in the south and Begum Momata in the west, we areinchingrunning towards cutting our own throats. Slowly, the python will try to squeeze the life out by choking the chicken neck.
View: https://x.com/TimesAlgebraIND/status/1814502648508297277?t=_u74JN-ooCB8qZ0AICikAg&s=19
There's no black pilling at all. You're looking at a LIC like situation from 2040 onwards likely earlier in Assam followed by West Bangladesh. This would be supported by Bangladesh once SHW is gone which she will sooner rather than later.If I could summarize the mitigation in the simplest terms, it would be:
Ousting Momta Begum prematurely,
Bang Kukis in the east,
Secure the BD borders, implement NRC, and send the mlecchas packing.
Modi 2.0 couldn't achieve all this with a strong 303 reasons, so don't expect much from 3.0, especially when he's been sucking on constitution.
Blackpilled forever..
It took him some time to understand that no matter how compassionate he gets, they will not change their attitude. Personally for me, the results of these general elections are a good thing - they are a wake up call for a few things that most Indians who turned 18 between 2014 and 2024 forgot -
Had BJP won 400+ seats, it would have taken an even more Leftist turn than traditional leftists did back in the dark days of secularism.
- The real intent of islamists
- The mindset of the average, pacifist Indian (mostly Hindu)
- The lack of understanding how the enemy thinks
- A little social unrest to keep Indians on their toes
Miyalords overturn the govt decision.
Wonder on what grounds? Don’t think it violated any fundamental rights?
View: https://x.com/timesalgebraind/status/1815303141447102673?s=46
But pismula's boycott of non-halal is actually constitution approved. And here court is poking it's nose beyond it's authority when Hindus want to know the origin of its food.This requires a "social" response, just like the Muslims who boycott anything non-Halal, Hindus must insist on knowing the service provider's name and food's sanctity before entering a facility.
The question is, will the Hindus take such an initiative?