None, but as I said if this is the stick.. internal SM outlets would have been the carrot. People need SM to keep their minds busy. If you dont provide they will hook onto something else.
Steps like above are half hearted attempts. Think ezsasa if Govt does not have its communication channel or medium what government it can give. This problem is going to reoccur with every move it makes. And currently SM is promoting anti establishment accounts since pre 2024 elections.
To explain in hypothetical historical scenario: It just like in the era of Radio Channels, Govt still relying horseback riders to announce news and too show its moving with times, get foreign long wave radio stations to play few local songs and Sarkari message sometimes.
But above scenario did not happen. Every Govt went on to build their own radio stations for governance.
I am not sure why Gen Z era Govts(this is party agnostic) do not think longterm.
can't have it both ways mate, if you want govt machinery to solve a particular problem, this is the natural course in democracy, there are very few scenarios where things happen at lighting speed, rest follow due process.
- public makes a demand
- public representatives asks bureaucracy to form a committee to officially collect public view.
- ministry asks law department to make a bill taking public and special interest group's views into consideration.
- a bill is drafted.
- the bill is again sent for public's representation, views are taken from stakeholders including the public.
- some views are incorporated, some are not.
- public representative table the bill in parliament, parliament may ask for the bill to be taken to standing committee. more changes may happen.
- lobbying happens within the parliament to get the bill passed into an act.
- during all this process, any time the effected parties(in this case social media) can use proxies can stall the process.
- if the bill is passed into an act, govt notifies the process thru gazette.
- the proxies, start lawfare in courts. govt defends their gazette rules in court. court may or may not agree with govt.
- if court does not give a favourable decision, process repeats via amendments or a new bill all together.
this whole process takes a few years.
if social media is the medium thru which this process is being observed, obviously their algorithms won't paint a picture that this process is moving in the right direction. one can only imagine how many psychologists and "political scientists" these companies have on their payroll, considering the prevailing globalist view seems to be that public are not supposed to dictating policies, they think populism is bad word.
google top search result.
Populism is a range of political stances that emphasize the idea of "the people" and often juxtapose this group with "the elite". It is frequently associated with anti-establishment and anti-political sentiment.
they have already declared that our opinions (public's opinion) are anti-establishment.
in effect, your frustration on regular process is par for the course for today's times. i get it, that you want govt to skip all this process. i have no explanation to convince you otherwise.
some of well meaning public spend lifetime getting one thing done, farm bill is an example. there was consensus built over three decades, yet it was only partially successful.
? This is too much man ..... Such anti national elements live among us in mainland India, beheading a soldier , I am flabbergasted.
