ISRO - General Discussions

[Anonymous Bharata]

Since Somnath sir himself have confirmed about the descent probe, let's wait for some more time , the render of the orbiter is not latest, it is atleast 2 years old

The reason why descent probe was missing from ISRO's website was because they haven't made a final decision on it yet. We will find out about it later

 

[Anonymous Bharata]

View: https://www.youtube.com/live/mRl7nyvmB7U?si=-IuZX4VdnBs2OP0D

 

[Anonymous Bharata]

View: https://youtu.be/3Pg5LfbnmMQ?si=Lm60QkUIm42mJqpE
Full interview

View: https://youtu.be/3zFzsnUQe-k?si=Kn64-inANUWdZ89c
Somnath sir lectured GS for his sarcasm

 

[Anonymous Bharata]

View: https://youtu.be/3Pg5LfbnmMQ?si=Lm60QkUIm42mJqpE
Full interview

View: https://youtu.be/3zFzsnUQe-k?si=Kn64-inANUWdZ89c
Somnath sir lectured GS for his sarcasm

Somnath sir again confirmed that NGLV-SH will have 70ton to LEO capability

 

[notaname]

Somnath sir again confirmed that NGLV-SH will have 70ton to LEO capability

Just to clarify, 30 Ton initially but expandable if needed to 70ton.

 

[Anonymous Bharata]

Just to clarify, 30 Ton initially but expandable if needed to 70ton.

Scalable, like increasing propellant loading

 

[Anonymous Bharata]

Finally, SBS-phase3 satellites

View: https://x.com/NewsIADN/status/1844595196694233530

 

[Blademaster]

Finally, SBS-phase3 satellites

View: https://x.com/NewsIADN/status/1844595196694233530

Great news!!! What is the resolution?

 

[Anonymous Bharata]

Great news!!! What is the resolution?

<30cms

 

[fire starter]

Indigenous FEA & CFD software.

 

[Anonymous Bharata]

Apparently CY-4 will also carry a small cubesat named "Shaktisat" , as part of international diplomacy, will be made by 108 girl students from 108 countries

Shaktisat mission:शक्तिसैट मिशन 108 देशों की 12 हजार लड़कियों को ट्रेनिंग देगा

Shaktisat mission: अंतरिक्ष क्षेत्र से जुड़े स्टार्टअप स्पेस किड्ज इंडिया ने अंतरिक्ष प्रौद्योगिकी पर 108 देशों की लगभग 12,000 लड़कियों को प्रशिक्षित करने के लिए एक वैश्विक मिशन ‘शक्तिसैट’ शुरू किया है। इसका लक्ष्य सरकारी अंतरिक्ष एजेंसी इसरो के चंद्रयान-4 मिशन के तहत एक उपग्रह का प्रक्षेपण करना...

www.google.com

British kids will also be part of this, lmao can't wait for the meltdown

 

[VictorDelta4]

 

[Anonymous Bharata]

Mars Lander Mission has completed the internal reviews, yet to be sent to space comission & the cabinet

View: https://x.com/Chethan_Dash/status/1845828216373600425

 

[TopWatcher]

View: https://twitter.com/Chethan_Dash/status/1845828595588973004

 

[SlayingHell]

So, Iam seeing all these Weird Inferiority Complex laden bots from Not-so-Developed Space Industry peedling news like ISRO is only successful because labor is cheap. That's it. How much of this argument is bullshit? Like MOM, CHANDRAYAAN, ADITYA and all these are possible not because they are cheap. I acknowledge they are paid Not-So-Abundantly but they peddle these "Muh Cheap Labor" arguments as if we Intelligence and Quality of Labor doesn't matter.

I still couldn't understand how exactly having cheap labor attributes to success of various complex missions like Moon Landing? I mean if being Cheap resulted in such, we should see dozens of these countries do it isn't it?

 

[Blademaster]

So, Iam seeing all these Weird Inferiority Complex laden bots from Not-so-Developed Space Industry peedling news like ISRO is only successful because labor is cheap. That's it. How much of this argument is bullshit? Like MOM, CHANDRAYAAN, ADITYA and all these are possible not because they are cheap. I acknowledge they are paid Not-So-Abundantly but they peddle these "Muh Cheap Labor" arguments as if we Intelligence and Quality of Labor doesn't matter.

I still couldn't understand how exactly having cheap labor attributes to success of various complex missions like Moon Landing? I mean if being Cheap resulted in such, we should see dozens of these countries do it isn't it?

They will be silenced once we launch a man into space and create orbiting space stations. We should try to land a man on the moon.

 

[karn]

So, Iam seeing all these Weird Inferiority Complex laden bots from Not-so-Developed Space Industry peedling news like ISRO is only successful because labor is cheap. That's it. How much of this argument is bullshit? Like MOM, CHANDRAYAAN, ADITYA and all these are possible not because they are cheap. I acknowledge they are paid Not-So-Abundantly but they peddle these "Muh Cheap Labor" arguments as if we Intelligence and Quality of Labor doesn't matter.

I still couldn't understand how exactly having cheap labor attributes to success of various complex missions like Moon Landing? I mean if being Cheap resulted in such, we should see dozens of these countries do it isn't it?

You answered your own question. If cheap labour is the major factor in a successful space program then countries with lower labour cost than us should be even more successful ..
Are you talking about Indians or lemme guess brits.

 

[SlayingHell]

You answered your own question. If cheap labour is the major factor in a successful space program then countries with lower labour cost than us should be even more successful ..
Are you talking about Indians or lemme guess brits.

Not britbongs, but a certain plastic obsessed country, where they inserted in every paragraph that it succeeded because of availability of "Muh Cheap labor" and not on Intellectual Potential. If these butthurt said "Well, these people poured billions and hence they could accomplish this" then that makes atleast a sense, but I could never ever comprehend how is landing on moon is tied to cheap labor and low salaries? Afterall Salaries is just a matter of convenience than can be increased with just a signature, where as even if you pour billions in certain kind of countries they couldn't manufacture a bike much less a moon rover.

I thought maybe I missed any reasons of this Cheap Labor rhetoric and hence asked here.

 

[karn]

Not britbongs, but a certain plastic obsessed country, where they inserted in every paragraph that it succeeded because of availability of "Muh Cheap labor" and not on Intellectual Potential. If these butthurt said "Well, these people poured billions and hence they could accomplish this" then that makes atleast a sense, but I could never ever comprehend how is landing on moon is tied to cheap labor and low salaries? Afterall Salaries is just a matter of convenience than can be increased with just a signature, where as even if you pour billions in certain kind of countries they couldn't manufacture a bike much less a moon rover.

I thought maybe I missed any reasons of this Cheap Labor rhetoric and hence asked here.

My dude .. why are you thinking of their talking points.
They think like this .. India has accomplished X , we have not.. So what do they have that we don't but is not a complement .. answer cheap labour .

 

[Varoon4]

^^^
It is those Western countries, particularly the English speaking ones, that are jealous, whiny and petty over India's achievements, because they haven't themseves done it. It is, barring the odd dissonant voice, not Mexico, Colombia, Congo, Philippines, Vietnam etc. Just to keep a,sense of perspective.