Sinking State of Bangladesh: Idiotic Musings

Even thease so called professor have to know how pakistani punjabi hates bangladeshi even when flood in pakistan pakistan refused bangladeshi aid
So most likely this guy is another isi asset
All practicing mullas are potential ISI assets.

That includes India, not just Bangladesh.
 
Kanglu to kanglu conversation
View attachment 9494
Kanglus should note that India will be last one to object Bangladesh having Nukes. India don't even need to do anything, Big Brothers gonna do Iraq 2.0. USA-Russia-China-UK-France may hate each other but they don't tolerate another Nuclear State. Heck, China will be the first one to object or take action since it want a puppet that doesn't dictate terms to it. USA and Russia will also be the first ones to interfere because the big brothers tolerance for Nuclear States already exceeded with India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel.
Kanglus should know the very reason even Japan and Korea doesn't do Nuke thingy because doing so collapses the delicate balance of already fragile order.
On the other part, Kanglus should first try to manufacture small parts such as Nuts, Bolts etc maybe after few decades they have qualifications to DREAM of Nuclear Weapons.
 
why not sar, we need to "encounter" India

View attachment 9504


Yes, sar, we have uranium in cocks bazar sar

View attachment 9505
Devloping nuke isn't the issue facing global diplomatic backlash and sanction after nuclear test is
Kanglus should note that India will be last one to object Bangladesh having Nukes. India don't even need to do anything, Big Brothers gonna do Iraq 2.0. USA-Russia-China-UK-France may hate each other but they don't tolerate another Nuclear State. Heck, China will be the first one to object or take action since it want a puppet that doesn't dictate terms to it. USA and Russia will also be the first ones to interfere because the big brothers tolerance for Nuclear States already exceeded with India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel.
Kanglus should know the very reason even Japan and Korea doesn't do Nuke thingy because doing so collapses the delicate balance of already fragile order.
On the other part, Kanglus should first try to manufacture small parts such as Nuts, Bolts etc maybe after few decades they have qualifications to DREAM of Nuclear Weapons.
 
why not sar, we need to "encounter" India

View attachment 9504


Yes, sar, we have uranium in cocks bazar sar

View attachment 9505
They never fail to amuse me. That nuclear power plant Russia is building for them comes under IAEA safeguards. Given that it is a Muslim country you can be rest assured Uncle Sam will have many eyes to make sure every gram of nuclear material is accounted for. Even landing on the moon was done 50 years ago. Does that mean it can be done now easily? None of the space agencies apart from NASA have attempted moon landing despite having rockets do so. These Kanglus have drank lot of that dirty Kool drink. Porki scums overestimate themselves to stratosphere. However, these Kanglu scums overestimate themselves to troposphere.
 
Even thease so called professor have to know how pakistani punjabi hates bangladeshi even when flood in pakistan pakistan refused bangladeshi aid
So most likely this guy is another isi asset
I have said this before and I am saying it again - a significant % of the Kanglu population would love to have the pakroaches back. They would happily turn a blind eye to the rhetorics of their paki masters if that is what it takes to cleanse Hindus ethnically.

Bangali muslim identity is a forced construct. There is a Bangali identity and a muslim identity - the two do not mix. It is not at all difficult to nullify the concept of a semi secular Bangali muslim nation-state with pan-islamism and jihad for the simple reason that kangluland is an artificial state.
 
Happens to be a rapist as well


"A Dhaka University inquiry has found Prof. Shahiduzzaman of International Relations guilty of sexual misconduct, sources said."


Joker



Old Porki-phile


Paki media on an overdrive:
Pakistani to gadhe ko bhi apna baap bana lete hain, ye to firr bhi bhowkta hua balatkaari hai
 
Last edited:
Also, 50% population of Pak too.

Logistically and geographically, it's impossible for US and Chian to help BD in case of an Indo BD conflict. Nowhere, by land or sea or air.

Even if a help is sent, it's simply insane to hit Indian military in Bay of Bengal near India's East Coast and Indian military in Myanmar and it's own territory. There is a reason why India with even shit equipment could take over BD in 13 days during 1971 war.

BD's geograhic, military and economic disadvantage against India worse worse than condition of small post Soviet states against Russia. Preventing an Indian expedition of BD requires an expedition of India itself which is not practical for any country.

For vs BD part, Indian Armed forces will decimate their main command in days if not hours within starting of war. Problem will be guerilla warfare from local population (unless GoI chooses to do massacres which they won't).
"For vs BD part, Indian Armed forces will decimate their main command in days if not hours within starting of war. Problem will be guerilla warfare from local population (unless GoI chooses to do massacres which they won't)"

We don't need to fight a guerrilla warfare,

Just like how Russians did in gorzny or Azerbaijan in karabakh, Russians in donbass region, flatten the area, make a blockade, create a crisis, which gonna led to a point where, they have to evacuate the civilians from the area, if the civilians fled from the area, Just massacre the defending troops, make up a defensive position, a new boundary or should we call annex the area, no need to occupy the whole country or installing a puppet govt
 
"For vs BD part, Indian Armed forces will decimate their main command in days if not hours within starting of war. Problem will be guerilla warfare from local population (unless GoI chooses to do massacres which they won't)"

We don't need to fight a guerrilla warfare,

Just like how Russians did in gorzny or Azerbaijan in karabakh, Russians in donbass region, flatten the area, make a blockade, create a crisis, which gonna led to a point where, they have to evacuate the civilians from the area, if the civilians fled from the area, Just massacre the defending troops, make up a defensive position, a new boundary or should we call annex the area, no need to occupy the whole country or installing a puppet govt

A few things to note:

1. Far better equipped armies have failed against rag tag guerilla forces - US/Soviets vs Afghanistan, US vs Vietnam etc. You can bet your ass that every external power will aid the guerillas and make life hell for IA.

2. IA will not conduct genocide or mass conversions nor install puppet dictatorships. So gaining territory doesn't mean anything. It will be an eternally troubled region like Afghanistan right in India's armpit.

3. Granted Ruskis are fighting 40+ nations in Ukraine, but they have been underwhelming to say the least. Both their men and equipment have taken a beating. Now try convincing me that somehow Indians are better at using Russian equipment/strategies better than Russians themselves?!?!

Moral of the story: IA will overcome the traditional BD army defenses but will get bogged down in a meat grinder in a marshland with multiple rivers and unlimited cannon fodder in terms of manpower. Please be mindful that there is no mukti bahini, Maneckshaw, Indira and more importantly USSR this time. So if we were clutching our balls at the sight of Abhinandan being a POW, fat chance we will have the gall to fight through a prolonged multiyear WW2 style meat grinder war.
 
So if we were clutching our balls at the sight of Abhinandan being a POW, fat chance we will have the gall to fight through a prolonged multiyear WW2 style meat grinder war.
A point many forget. Do we have the stomach?

The opposition parties will start emotional drama and even so called RW Hindus will start demanding peace.
 
You can bet your ass that every external power will aid the guerillas and make life hell for IA.
It will be rather be hell for any external power to aid Bangladeshi guerilla in a landmass surrounded by Indian land on 3 sides and Bay of Bengal in South.

Bangladesh doesn't have geographical liberty to have foreign assistance like Pakistan. It was the reason at first place why we could take over and break it away from Pak.
 
A few things to note:

1. Far better equipped armies have failed against rag tag guerrilla forces - US/Soviets vs Afghanistan, US vs Vietnam etc. You can bet your ass that every external power will aid the guerillas and make life hell for IA.

2. IA will not conduct genocide or mass conversions nor install puppet dictatorships. So gaining territory doesn't mean anything. It will be an eternally troubled region like Afghanistan right in India's armpit.

3. Granted Ruskis are fighting 40+ nations in Ukraine, but they have been underwhelming to say the least. Both their men and equipment have taken a beating. Now try convincing me that somehow Indians are better at using Russian equipment/strategies better than Russians themselves?!?!

Moral of the story: IA will overcome the traditional BD army defenses but will get bogged down in a meat grinder in a marshland with multiple rivers and unlimited cannon fodder in terms of manpower. Please be mindful that there is no mukti bahini, Maneckshaw, Indira and more importantly USSR this time. So if we were clutching our balls at the sight of Abhinandan being a POW, fat chance we will have the gall to fight through a prolonged multiyear WW2 style meat grinder war.
You don't fight like it's a insurgency, we don't have to occupy the whole country, we have to occupy the strategic area's
Such as capturing rangpur, dinajpur near Siliguri near Siliguri corridor, cox bazar some area's in Chittagong hills

The USA in Vietnam wanted to install puppet govt, same thing in Afghanistan & Iraq, but they failed & fought decade long inseergency guerrilla war, so did we in srilanka, our work was maintaining the law & order for the people who didn't want those, same thing USA did,

We don't have to fight like ipkf nor occupying the whole country or maintaining law & order, gaining terrority is definitely futile, gaining the fertile land is definitely not a loss, we get widen the corridor, a port to link up with north east do you really think the Chinese didn't gain anything from the captured akasi chin & areas in Arunachal

Fight like russkies means how they bombed the city of grozny or the town's near dinper, donbass, which have become a ghost towns, nobody lives there, no civilians population means no space for guerrilla warfare,
 
It will be rather be hell for any external power to aid Bangladeshi guerilla in a landmass surrounded by Indian land on 3 sides and Bay of Bengal in South.

Bangladesh doesn't have geographical liberty to have foreign assistance like Pakistan. It was the reason at first place why we could take over and break it away from Pak.
The NE states are compromised to say the least - the lack of development and general connectivity with rest of India has left them vulnerable to illicit conversions to Xtianity, drugs/weapons trafficking etc. which have been fully exploited by a lot of external powers including the PRC/US. Anyone who has visited Siliguri corridor knows what I am talking about. You can rest assured that they will figure out a route through the NE states or Myanmar and riverine coastlines to get supplies to BD guerillas. If IA decides to get involved, it should go in fully understanding the gravity of the situation and be ready for the costs that it would incur. Underplaying the risk would be at our own peril.
 
You don't fight like it's a insurgency, we don't have to occupy the whole country, we have to occupy the strategic area's
Such as capturing rangpur, dinajpur near Siliguri near Siliguri corridor, cox bazar some area's in Chittagong hills

The USA in Vietnam wanted to install puppet govt, same thing in Afghanistan & Iraq, but they failed & fought decade long inseergency guerrilla war, so did we in srilanka, our work was maintaining the law & order for the people who didn't want those, same thing USA did,

We don't have to fight like ipkf nor occupying the whole country or maintaining law & order, gaining terrority is definitely futile, gaining the fertile land is definitely not a loss, we get widen the corridor, a port to link up with north east do you really think the Chinese didn't gain anything from the captured akasi chin & areas in Arunachal

Fight like russkies means how they bombed the city of grozny or the town's near dinper, donbass, which have become a ghost towns, nobody lives there, no civilians population means no space for guerrilla warfare,

IA is not Ruski army in terms of mandates and operational policies. Red army and Ruski army have a tradition of scorched earth which IA would probably never adopt. So in all likelihood we may end up gaining fertile territory along with the maggots who inhabit there, which will just be an endless pain in the ass.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Donate via Bitcoin - bc1qpc3h2l430vlfflc8w02t7qlkvltagt2y4k9dc2

qrcode
Back
Top