- Joined
- Jul 2, 2024
- Messages
- 214
- Likes
- 586
If we went also for boom-tanker system then AMCA could have spine-receptacle system with lower RCS from front & right side.
Compatibility with the fleetIf we went also for boom-tanker system then AMCA could have spine-receptacle system with lower RCS from front & right side.
There are tankers with mixed options also : boom + drogue, we should consider. some countries operate both types separately also. F-18 uses drogue while others use boom.Compatibility with the fleet
You can say that about Koreans, but you can't use the Kaan program as an excuse. US has even placed embargoes on the simplest, least critical things like electrical cables, actuators, landing gears and cockpit glass for the Kaan project.Don't compare the Turkish and Korean programs to AMCA. They are nowhere near indigenous.
Everyone with a 2-Bit Braincell knows what's gonna happen.Unreliable idrw.com claims that Safran has offered 100% TOT on the proposed 110kN engine plus no limits on exports. That would make it very easy to negotiate TOT - nothing to discuss. If true, I would expect a considerable price hike as a result, possibly killing a deal. I guess the same would happen with a 100% TOT deal with RR or GE..
If IDRW reports it, it won't happen.Unreliable idrw.com claims that Safran has offered 100% TOT on the proposed 110kN engine plus no limits on exports. That would make it very easy to negotiate TOT - nothing to discuss. If true, I would expect a considerable price hike as a result, possibly killing a deal. I guess the same would happen with a 100% TOT deal with RR or GE.
I don't think that SAFRAN needs funds from India to develop a 6G engine. France, Germany and Spain are funding that.Everyone with a 2-Bit Braincell knows what's gonna happen.
At best, they will use the funds of billions of dollars from GoI to develop a more cutting edge engine for their sixth generation planes while giving us Know-How of some 80s or 90s level Jet Engine. It means we still have to do R&D again for Know-Why unless gormint is content with just that.
At worst, they will use the funds of billions of dollars from GoI to develop a more cutting edge engine for their sixth generation plane while dragging AMCA engine long enough until GoI frustrates. Then they will cite some obscure reasons and propose incorporating some safran core into AMCA engine. Then they will gonna be manufacturing Hot Section exclusively in France and India will be manufacturing Cold Section. This will ensure that even after the billions of dollars, India will now be milked again to death.
The chance of first scenario happening is very very less likely than second.
So, gormint's either has to go with 2 vendors simultaneously and fund 2 in parallel releasing funds according to milestones of program or just develop inhouse. Funding only 1 vendor will 100% be a trap.
It's not just IDRW but a lot of other publications are reporting the same & have been doing so for the past 2 years.Unreliable idrw.com claims that Safran has offered 100% TOT on the proposed 110kN engine plus no limits on exports. That would make it very easy to negotiate TOT - nothing to discuss. If true, I would expect a considerable price hike as a result, possibly killing a deal. I guess the same would happen with a 100% TOT deal with RR or GE.
1. Its not Fast Jet but Low Bypass Turbofan.I don't think that SAFRAN needs funds from India to develop a 6G engine. France, Germany and Spain are funding that.
Does any of the 3 major OEM's need to put its newer technologies into a new 110kN engine to make a viable engine? I don't see why when GTRE/Indian technology is so far behind that India cannot even make a 1980's technology engine. India has no choice but to call in a company that does know how to make fast jet engines. I think the 3 majors are in a position to take India to the cleaners.
About SAFRAN taking charge of hot section development: India cannot do it. To get a decent engine, SAFRAN have to design it or base it one of their existing designs, don't they?
I don't know how far India could have advanced since deciding to pursue Kaveri but I'm confident it could have got much further with fast jet technology with much higher investment, better project management, proper accountability all round. It seems to me that India is in a very weak position in terms of joint development of an engine with a major.
I like the idea of having 2 majors working in competition. US government did that with F-16 engines and is supposed to have saved hundreds of millions or even billions through better prices but that was for production engines. How does India monitor development requirements and development performance of 2 OEM's when Indian fast jet designers may have no experience or understanding of what the developers are doing or why they are doing it? It's a bit like asking a 10 year old to assess how well 2 mathematics undergraduates are progressing at individually solving a mathematical problem.
I get your point that the majors may be keen to cash in on 'selling' technology that should soon be superceded by variable cycle engines.It's not just IDRW but a lot of other publications are reporting the same & have been doing so for the past 2 years.
What's more a senior DRDO official has been seconded to the Indian embassy in Paris for more than a year & counting . Why ? I've no clue but it's anyone's guess.
It's my hunch that India's bargaining not just for the technology of the 120 KN TF with full IPR but for what's going into the SCAF namely an variable / alternate cycle engine.
That's tomorrow's technology & that's also the reason RR , SAFRAN & GE are in such a generous mood because they're moving on to the next gen which renders whatever they have today obsolete within the next 1-2 decades.
With generous here describing their willingness to share the know how & the know why not in terms of the cost which will still be a pretty packet. Having said that GE is still sticking to its guns of limited ToT with no IPR which sort of rules them out but which doesn't bother them a bit.
Left to ourselves we can develop a F-404 equivalent or something marginally better without outside help except perhaps in consultancy within a decade.
That also seems to be the aim of GTRE which is to get the Kaveri upto the F-404 standard in order for it to be eligible to go into the Mk-1a during the MLU , 15 years from now .
1 Agreed1. Its not Fast Jet but Low Bypass Turbofan.
2. Design is not the Problem but Manufacturing is.
3. There are atmost 5 countries with the capability of those very same 1980s-level Engine Manufacturing capability. You sound as if dozens of countries have it. Chinese didn't had it even recently despite larger economy and advanced manufacturing capabilities.
4. DRDO wouldn't come until this far with Dry Kaveri running if they don't even know some advanced level of LBTF understanding. You sound as if Top Brass including DRDO GTRE are dumb as rocks on the level of Saudi and other Middle East countries and the Dry Kaveri on the Test Bed is some Computer Graphics.
DRDO / GTRE have recently sought funds from the MoD to set up a 120 KN capacity high altitude engine test bed . The Kaveri Dry version will be ready by next year which will go into the UCAV Ghatak which is expected to be flight ready in the next 4-5 years post which it'd take another 5 years to be certified .I get your point that the majors may be keen to cash in on 'selling' technology that should soon be superceded by variable cycle engines.
Another 10 years to get Kaveri working reliably? I sense that there are too many people involved who like having a job rather than doing a job. If they delay for a year in admitting that they are stuck and need outside help, they will have their job for a year longer. No chance of losing their job for causing a year's delay to the project, is there?
Has anyone in GTRE ever thought of paying bonuses for getting things done reasonably quickly rather than at a snail's pace?
It's not just IDRW but a lot of other publications are reporting the same & have been doing so for the past 2 years.
What's more a senior DRDO official has been seconded to the Indian embassy in Paris for more than a year & counting . Why ? I've no clue but it's anyone's guess.
It's my hunch that India's bargaining not just for the technology of the 120 KN TF with full IPR but for what's going into the SCAF namely an variable / alternate cycle engine.
That's tomorrow's technology & that's also the reason RR , SAFRAN & GE are in such a generous mood because they're moving on to the next gen which renders whatever they have today obsolete within the next 1-2 decades.
With generous here describing their willingness to share the know how & the know why not in terms of the cost which will still be a pretty packet. Having said that GE is still sticking to its guns of limited ToT with no IPR which sort of rules them out but which doesn't bother them a bit.
Left to ourselves we can develop a F-404 equivalent or something marginally better without outside help except perhaps in consultancy within a decade.
That also seems to be the aim of GTRE which is to get the Kaveri upto the F-404 standard in order for it to be eligible to go into the Mk-1a during the MLU , 15 years from now .
DRDO / GTRE have recently sought funds from the MoD to set up a 120 KN capacity high altitude engine test bed . The Kaveri Dry version will be ready by next year which will go into the UCAV Ghatak which is expected to be flight ready in the next 4-5 years post which it'd take another 5 years to be certified .
Now GTRE has the option of going in for development of the AFB version & begin testing it a year or two after the flight trails off the Ghatak. Alternatively & this seems to be the path GTRE is taking they will try to develop the AFB within the next 2-3 years post which they'd flight test on a Flight Test Bed .
As per reports in the public domain they're asking for an LCA to function as the FTB but as of now nothing's confirmed nor do we have an FTB. This is a severely under funded program & the reason it's under funded is coz GTRE didn't deliver as per what they'd committed & the reason GTRE didn't deliver is because they're under funded among other reasons.
Hence as long as we don't resolve this Catch 22 situation , we'd be running around in circles. This has little or nothing to do with your suppositions. There seem to be strong reports suggesting either later this year or early next year we should be seeing an announcement towards the revival of the Kaveri program. Fingers crossed.