Indian Air Force: News & Discussions

Nop, those factors were considered into database. CMO even considered IRST parameters, FLIR during the simulation.

1. Conflict simulation on Tibet region.
Fleet mostly took off from Hotan

2. Conflict simulation on Karachi
Fleet mostly took off from air bases in Pakistan

3. Conflict simulation in A&N island.
Fleet mostly took off from Yunnan provinces.
1.) If those flights took off from Hotan , they're targeting Ladakh & J&K . Hotan itself is vulnerable to the IAF. Look at the dispersed bases not just in that region in question but also surrounding regions as far as the IAF is concerned.

2.) Immaterial. Paxtan is not going to base PLAAF nor will they be part of this . If they do they'd be nuked . What's more they know it !

3.) That's where we'd be basing the Rafale M along with the MKI.

It's going to be a roughly even contest . It's not going to be a one sided affair your civilian defence enthusiasts think it'd be.
 
Absolutely correct but not for J-20s.

The normal carry for stealth fighters is only that much what it can internally carry, not it's absolutely total payload. For J-20 it's hardly 1.5t (4x PL-15s of 250kg each and 2x PL-10s of 100kg each); a fraction of its total payload.
I meant the total carrying capacity including fuel. J-20s have a 2000 kms combat range other than while operating from Tibet. That's the reason they've been practising air refuelling over Tibet flying with partial load of fuel .
 
Nop, those factors were considered into database. CMO even considered IRST parameters, FLIR during the simulation.

1. Conflict simulation on Tibet region.
Fleet mostly took off from Hotan

2. Conflict simulation on Karachi
Fleet mostly took off from air bases in Pakistan

3. Conflict simulation in A&N island.
Fleet mostly took off from Yunnan provinces.
you will lose in real war because what really will change a war is Lasers destroying ICBMs and Biological weapons to clean large armies, remember the Russians claim Genetic weapons exist

'Targeting Russians But Safe for Americans': What Bioweapons is the Pentagon Developing?​


The U.S. Military Wants to Kill Nuclear-Armed ICBMs with Lasers​

Here's how.


Chinese doritos will not change anything if the Americans get what they are researching the face of war will change in ways no one expects

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDioNFLaKCU

Lockheed Martin Laser Breakthroughs Could Signal A Turning Point For Missile Defense​


1736167460369.webp

Air defense for $13 a shot? How lasers could revolutionize the way militaries counter enemy missiles and drones​




View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLbTnAqTPpU
 
Last edited:
Found this on twitter.


View: https://x.com/cvkrishnan/status/1876256686262149582

It makes sense, in place of (((offsets))) in exchange for 36 IAF + 26 IN Rafales we get access to specific baguette tech items/support
  1. Dassault design support for TEDBF/ORCA( :pmegusta: )
  2. SSN class pumpjet tech
  3. Safran support for IMRH engine, spoon feeding for our DRDO boys basically to make the whole engine
  4. Same as the above but for whatever is Kaveri's tech related issue
  5. Anything else y'all nibbiars think we can get from Frenchies?
inb4 anyone misunderstands, we will pay for these but ofc for that these have to be on offer first.
 
UK, Italy invite India to join GCAP 6th generation fighter programme
Defence Forces Newsroom December 28, 2024 62


In a move that could significantly reshape the landscape of international defence collaboration, the UK and Italy have expressed their support for inviting India to join the Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP). This ambitious initiative, which already includes Japan, aims to develop a sixth-generation stealth fighter by 2035. This is not the first time India has been approached to participate. Two years ago, the UK extended an initial invitation for India to join Project Tempest, the precursor to the current GCAP.

 
Found this on twitter.


View: https://x.com/cvkrishnan/status/1876256686262149582

It makes sense, in place of (((offsets))) in exchange for 36 IAF + 26 IN Rafales we get access to specific baguette tech items/support
  1. Dassault design support for TEDBF/ORCA( :pmegusta: )
  2. SSN class pumpjet tech
  3. Safran support for IMRH engine, spoon feeding for our DRDO boys basically to make the whole engine
  4. Same as the above but for whatever is Kaveri's tech related issue
  5. Anything else y'all nibbiars think we can get from Frenchies?
inb4 anyone misunderstands, we will pay for these but ofc for that these have to be on offer first.

You are assuming that they will honor them in first place.
 
Found this on twitter.


View: https://x.com/cvkrishnan/status/1876256686262149582

It makes sense, in place of (((offsets))) in exchange for 36 IAF + 26 IN Rafales we get access to specific baguette tech items/support
  1. Dassault design support for TEDBF/ORCA( :pmegusta: )
  2. SSN class pumpjet tech
  3. Safran support for IMRH engine, spoon feeding for our DRDO boys basically to make the whole engine
  4. Same as the above but for whatever is Kaveri's tech related issue
  5. Anything else y'all nibbiars think we can get from Frenchies?
inb4 anyone misunderstands, we will pay for these but ofc for that these have to be on offer first.



MRFA is back because, Rahul Gandhi cried scam and entire bajapa wants to show they are non corrupts.

Decade passed now. Ideally should went for same G2G deal of another 72 (if money is there) to get that number.

But here we back with same circus.
 
To fight against capable enemies like China and Pakistan even 45 squadron is not adequate. IAF always wanted sanctioned strength of fighter squadron to be atleast 55 squadrons minimum.

Will probably reach 45+ squadrons if you count the Ghatak drones & replace AJTs with LIFTs. Maybe get dinner smaller stealthy tactical bombers.
 
Will probably reach 45+ squadrons if you count the Ghatak drones & replace AJTs with LIFTs. Maybe get dinner smaller stealthy tactical bombers.
dinner? 🍽️:rolleyes::confusedd:
 

Reflected Radio waves can be reflected back by ionosphere and picked by Radar? Radar can infer wrong position? GCI can direct plane to wrong coordinates? Now I am not sure if the Missile Fired was a R-73 slaved to HCS? who knows whats the details. But he is an officer - he must have his reason to believe it was kind of mirage. And he also pointed that these things happened only in specific months of year..
 
Reflected Radio waves can be reflected back by ionosphere and picked by Radar? Radar can infer wrong position? GCI can direct plane to wrong coordinates? Now I am not sure if the Missile Fired was a R-73 slaved to HCS? who knows whats the details. But he is an officer - he must have his reason to believe it was kind of mirage. And he also pointed that these things happened only in specific months of year..

Reflected radio waves will show a scatter pattern / whitenouse on radar, not a point / object.

Radar can infer wrong position but that won’t be an illusion which eye can see but radar calibration issue.

Even for HCS lock it HAS to be an IR lock, not LOAL fire.

Now I don’t want to go into conspiracy territory but almost all large Armed Forces have detected UAPs using multiple sensors which rules it out as a mere “illusion”.

In the lack of solid evidence of their origins speculations are bound to run amok. But yeah, they are solid physical objects with mass.
 
Okay, it seems you Guys are bit too excited about UFOs and aliens and probes. There are multiple phenomena and objects that can be classified as somthing "UAP". So no need to even think about this news unless we see some US Navy type FLIR recording of a tic-tac.

Moreover he's a retired officer, he can say anything. Especially when our official channels of communication can publicly put out stuff like this

View: https://x.com/adgpi/status/1122911748829270016
 
Okay, it seems you Guys are bit too excited about UFOs and aliens and probes. There are multiple phenomena and objects that can be classified as somthing "UAP". So no need to even think about this news unless we see some US Navy type FLIR recording of a tic-tac.

Moreover he's a retired officer, he can say anything. Especially when our official channels of communication can publicly put out stuff like this

View: https://x.com/adgpi/status/1122911748829270016

Will look for yeti
Will shoot at UFO
Will make chairs

Will not replace fiber glass helmets.
 
Will look for yeti
Will shoot at UFO
Will make chairs

Will not replace fiber glass helmets.
UN Generals are like:

It's an illusion. It is bloody happening thausands of mile away in sky and picked by radar.

One point of time we have fired missile on it.
 

Latest Replies

Featured Content

Trending Threads

Back
Top