- Joined
- Jul 3, 2024
- Messages
- 437
- Likes
- 1,184
Show me any source where customer (IAF) insisted on GE404? It was HALs decision to go with imported engine after Kaveri failed the tests.
I think You must have heard about RFI kind of things where Manufacturers send technical evaluation and cost to consumer.
In these requests (If you have any knowledge how a company works ) production agency start manufacturing only after costumer agreed/happy with all points/systems.
So how come HAL is responsible for engine selection?? Airforce have a wing of millitary intelligence where they also look into it. But HAL have nothing like this.
So IAF agreeing with HAL means, IAF had verified all possibilities.
Further to clear your confusion, recently Chinese Items were found in Dhanush howitzer which resulted in Inquiry and rejection of product. But you will still say UN Generals has nothing to do while buying weapons for themselves.
MoD/IAF ordered the jets. Its HALs responsibility to deliver, not IAFs. The decision to choose GE engines (prone to sanctions), vs. Snecma engines (lower thrust) vs. RD-33 (an absolute garbage with high failure rate) rests completely on the manufactuer HAL, and Tejas will be evaluated on that basis.
This attitude is my problem. How boldly you writting "it's HAL problem" as soon as things go south.
Don't you think all should be blamed specially IAF and GoI who failed to judge the situation and failed to mitigate drawback of selecting GE engine??
Technically, I explained to you that is not IAF's problem, its HALs. If tomorrow war starts and IAF is short on jets nobody will blame HAL for not delivering jets but IAF for not taking correct decisions of buying required equipments. Its the same logic. Everyone has a different area of responsibility.
Again, Your bias is clearly visible again.
Tell me who need fighter jets?? iAF.
Who is not getting fighter jets?? IAF
Who is low in squadrons ?? IAF
If war happened then who will be blamed?? IAF
So it is/was IAF problem But still IAF chose to remain a sitting duck.
IAF should have acted much earlier to avoid this mess. But you people were defending IAF then and even today.
My problem is I still tolerate your bullshit in the name of free speech when its actually free garbage.
Your problem is you want monopoly of abusing one side only. The moment someone point out towards you. You become agitated and start threatening.
You love to live in own ECHO chamber. When IAF chosen AWAC system on Air India jets, I was first to appreciate their decision.
You are just defending Generals meanwhile soldiers are dying daily and you happy.
Thanks for reminding, this is your second last warning. Write meaningful posts without uttering abuses.
Never blackmail me like HR, happens in Indian office. You want to ban then ban me. If you are so dedicated to serve UN Generals then please go ahead. Make DFB a echo chamber.