- Joined
- Jul 7, 2024
- Messages
- 853
- Likes
- 2,776
keep that in mind, C 295 can take maximum payload of 9000 kg. but with 6000 kg payload it can give near 3700 km range. 9000 kg payload will give near 2800-3000 km range. so its good for AWACS role, coz our two enimies hv border with us....but average for aerial refuler role. it can filled oil to aircrafts only near 1500-1700 km range. which is little better than heavy weight fighter aircraft combat range. that mean if our su 30 mki (which hv 1500 km combat range) fly with C295 based refueler, C295 only give su 30 mki additional 1500 km combat range. that make su 30 mki combat range 3000 km. which is average capabilities.There are way more informed members on this thread, I'd let them come up with a more exhaustive list. I'd state just one advantage.
Of all the planes in IAF inventory that are actively used, Il-76s have kind of comically severe spare parts issue. Not a big deal for transport as C-17s are already there to complement them...but a big deal because all our aerial refueler and large AWACS are Il-76s.
So one advantage that C-295 would definitely bring is the fact that we've a full fledged assembly line here in India.
but if we buy C130 aircraft like medium weight transport in our 40-80 medium weight transport aircraft deal. nd buy some 6-10 additional C130 aircraft to modify it in a refueler. C130 aircraft hv maximum payload of 19000 kg. its range is 7300 km. so it can give near 3600 km combat range. so it can boost a su 30 mki fleet operation capabilities near 1500+3600= 5100 km. compare to C295 3000 km combat range, it is significant boost. that mean more oil nd more combat range (specially beneficial in sea operation).
so for AWACS C 295 is good choice (if we r not making 12 netra 1 nd netra 2 AWACS). but for refueling role we should prefer another medium weight class transport.
beside this navy is planning to buy 15 C295 based reconnaissance aircraft. but 18-28 C95 based antiship nd antisubmarine varient is very beneficial for our navy.